2019
DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scoring systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity with simple, rapid outcome measures

Abstract: ObjectiveExisting methods for grading lupus flares or improvement require definition-based thresholds as increments of change. Visual analogue scales (VAS) allow rapid, continuous scaling of disease severity. We analysed the performance of the SELENA SLEDAI Physician’s Global Assessment (SSPGA) and the Lupus Foundation of America-Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus (LFA-REAL) as measures of improvement or worsening in SLE.MethodsWe evaluated the agreement between prospectively collected measures of lupus dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, by dividing the lymphocyte count by the monocyte count, the blood lymphocyte/monocyte ratio was computed manually. The SLE Disease Current Activity Form (SLEDI) was used to assess disease activity, which is a simple and logical tool for describing and assessing diverse signs of active SLE and thereby assessing the efficacy of medication in controlling the disease [16].…”
Section: Evaluation and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, by dividing the lymphocyte count by the monocyte count, the blood lymphocyte/monocyte ratio was computed manually. The SLE Disease Current Activity Form (SLEDI) was used to assess disease activity, which is a simple and logical tool for describing and assessing diverse signs of active SLE and thereby assessing the efficacy of medication in controlling the disease [16].…”
Section: Evaluation and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ethnicity, regardless of race), criteria for the 1997 revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) SLE classification, SLE disease activity from a clinical visit up to 26 weeks before antibody testing as measured by the hybrid Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), and medication use, with a focus on glucocorticoids, hydroxychloroquine, and immuno suppress ants (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, belimumab, tacrolimus, other miscellaneous medi cations taken at the time, and cyclophosphamide or rituximab within 1 year of COVID-19 symptoms or RT-PCR when available or antibody testing). [10][11][12][13] Data on comorbid conditions and components of the hybrid SLEDAI and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Damage Index were obtained by physicians via patients' medical history, physical examinations, and chart review. 14 Patients provided written consent to participate in the study.…”
Section: Implications Of All the Available Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Damage Index (SDI) 25 and SELENA-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) hybrid 26 27 were recorded during routine clinical visits. The SELENA-SLEDAI hybrid 28 comprises the same definitions as the original SELENA-SLENA-SLEDAI, 29 but uses the definition of the SLEDAI and SLEDAI-2K 27 to score the domain of proteinuria. We chose the hybrid because the SELENA-SLEDAI only scores 4 points for proteinuria when there is an increase of 500 mg/24 hours over the previous visit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%