“…Defenders of the classical surgical tendon re-approximation approach argue superior benefits for young and active patients; lower re-rupture rates and a faster return to activities [3]. Recent evidence, however, suggests that a conservative approach, in the form of a well-structured rehabilitation program focused on intensive early mobilization, can achieve results that are comparable to surgical treatment, while also avoiding the risks of operative complications such as infection and soft-tissue related complications [1,[4][5][6]. Nevertheless, conservative treatment protocols as currently reported in the literature pose a challenge to patients, physicians and physical therapists for being time-consuming, as well as having the potential for both poor compliance and loss to follow-up [6].…”