Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online 2019
DOI: 10.1002/9781118445112.stat08179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bayesian Methods in Sport Statistics

Abstract: Bayesian techniques are being quickly adopted in sports settings. The volume and variety of data produced in sports activities over the past years and the availability of software packages for Bayesian computation have contributed positively to this growth. This article provides a brief review of the latest advances in Bayesian statistics in sports, covering methods and applications. In the literature surveyed, we found a similar number of publications between 2013 and 2017 and those published in the three pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Effect size (Cohen’s d factor) and confidence intervals were calculated with OriginPro 2016 Sr2 software (Northampton, MA, USA) and the post-hoc classification for effect size (based on modular Cohen’s d values) was: |d| ≥ 0.10, very small; |d| ≥ 0.20, small; |d| ≥ 0.50, medium; |d| ≥ 0.80, large; |d| ≥ 1.20, very large; and |d| ≥ 2.00, huge [ 36 ]. Bayesian inference analysis was performed based on prior information collected from published works, considering: BF10 < 3 (anecdotal); 10 > BF10 > 3 (moderate); 30 > BF10 > 10 (strong); 100 > BF10 > 30 (very strong); 300 > BF10 > 100 (extremely strong); BF10 > 300 (extreme) [ 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect size (Cohen’s d factor) and confidence intervals were calculated with OriginPro 2016 Sr2 software (Northampton, MA, USA) and the post-hoc classification for effect size (based on modular Cohen’s d values) was: |d| ≥ 0.10, very small; |d| ≥ 0.20, small; |d| ≥ 0.50, medium; |d| ≥ 0.80, large; |d| ≥ 1.20, very large; and |d| ≥ 2.00, huge [ 36 ]. Bayesian inference analysis was performed based on prior information collected from published works, considering: BF10 < 3 (anecdotal); 10 > BF10 > 3 (moderate); 30 > BF10 > 10 (strong); 100 > BF10 > 30 (very strong); 300 > BF10 > 100 (extremely strong); BF10 > 300 (extreme) [ 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A su vez, el coeficiente de determinación (R 2 ) fue determinado para expresar el porcentaje de cambio entre las variables analizadas (Borda Pérez et al, 2013). La magnitud de las correlaciones fue interpretada utilizando la d de Cohen utilizando los criterios propuestos por Hopkins et al, (2009) (Marsman & Wagenmakers, 2017;Quintana & Williams, 2018;Santos-Fernandez, Wu, & Mengersen, 2019). La interpretación de los resultados fue realizada de acuerdo según la clasificación de los valores de Jeffreys donde para H 1 : 1 a 3 se consideró [débil], 3 a 10 [moderado] y > 10 [fuerte] (van Doorn et al, 2020).…”
Section: Análisis Estadísticounclassified
“…In this direction, Bayesian methods make it possible to combine the information contained in the observed data and the subjectivity of different experts in sports [6]. The knowledge acquired from the experts will be added as a prior probabilistic distribution as, for example, these elements may consider aspects such as the expected recruitment of a player (to a certain team) or his/her physical performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%