2022
DOI: 10.1002/mus.27746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CIDP prognosis in patients with IVIG treatment‐related fluctuations

Abstract: Introduction/aims Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired immune‐mediated peripheral nerve disorder with variable prognosis and long‐term dependence on immunotherapy. Frequent assessment of grip strength can be a useful tool to identify intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment‐related fluctuations (TRFs) and optimize IVIG treatment in real‐time, but the long‐term implications of TRFs are unknown. We aimed to explore the impact that real‐time TRFs had on long‐term CIDP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason for the lack of correlation between INCAT‐ODSS and Z ‐Scores could be that the INCAT‐ODSS does not reflect active neuronal damage, but also reflects residual damage that does not result in elevated sNfL levels. This finding is in line with a recent study showing that TRFs measured by grip strength do not seem to lead to a higher long‐term disease burden [22]. This again indicates that TRFs have no pathological correlate in the sense of neuronal damage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One reason for the lack of correlation between INCAT‐ODSS and Z ‐Scores could be that the INCAT‐ODSS does not reflect active neuronal damage, but also reflects residual damage that does not result in elevated sNfL levels. This finding is in line with a recent study showing that TRFs measured by grip strength do not seem to lead to a higher long‐term disease burden [22]. This again indicates that TRFs have no pathological correlate in the sense of neuronal damage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, patients frequently report significant improvement shortly after the infusion, a phenomenon not yet explained from a pathophysiological standpoint. These gradual changes and fluctuations cannot be adequately reflected by current measurements, which only offer a ‘snapshot’ of the patient’s status at the time and place of examination [ 7 ]. Moreover, current outcome measures from prospective trials in IVIG treated patients do not allow meaningful conclusions for daily routine [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%