“…Metabarcoding has been successfully applied in a number of studies as a powerful and repeatable method for characterizing biodiversity (Hänfling et al, ; Leray & Knowlton, ). The flexibility of metabarcoding protocols allows the analyses of a wide range of sample types (sediment: Guardiola et al, , substrate: Wangensteen et al, , seawater: Bakker et al, , bulk invertebrate samples: Elbrecht & Leese, , stomach contents: Siegenthaler, Wangensteen, Benvenuto, Campos, & Mariani, and scat: Berry et al, ), to more recent approaches that utilize natural environmental samplers as a tool to survey marine biodiversity such as utilizing the diet profiles of benthic scavengers to assess fish diversity or harnessing water‐filtering sponges to sample environmental DNA (natural sampler DNA—nsDNA; Mariani, Baillie, Colosimo, & Riesgo, ; Siegenthaler, Wangensteen, Soto, et al, ). While metabarcoding of environmental samples has many limitations associated with primer performance, bioinformatic workflows and study design (Elbrecht, Hebert, & Steinke, ), it overcomes many morphology‐based challenges in identifying species at different levels (e.g.…”