Abstract:Principal-agent (PA) has come a long way since it was introduced to the political science sphere. Nowadays, PA has established itself as an institutional midrange theoretical framework that encompasses various methodological as well as theoretical approaches. This article argues, however, that scholars still assume, a priori, that the agent is an opportunistic and disloyal actor. This article seeks to question this theoretical assumption by demonstrating how principals could be as much problematic as their age… Show more
“…These rules, together with power asymmetries within the collective principal, give (individual) actors credible instruments of (individual) control even if they need to act as a collective (Adriaensen 2016;Dijkstra this volume). This leads to what Sobol (2016) calls "pathological delegation": individual actions of control by separate actors within a collective principal undermine the collective delegation effort as well as the agent's work.…”
“…These rules, together with power asymmetries within the collective principal, give (individual) actors credible instruments of (individual) control even if they need to act as a collective (Adriaensen 2016;Dijkstra this volume). This leads to what Sobol (2016) calls "pathological delegation": individual actions of control by separate actors within a collective principal undermine the collective delegation effort as well as the agent's work.…”
“…The answer is that while many principal-agent scholars focus traditionally on the collectivity of member states, they should pay more attention to the individual member states and their behaviour (Gutner 2005;Thompson 2007;Sobol 2016). Individual member states make trade-offs in Treaty negotiations, face incomplete contracting and uncertainty and engage in bureaucratic politics.…”
“…Collective principals divided into subgroups with heterogeneous preferences often imply the risk of so-called pathological delegation (Sobol 2016). Some subgroups can benefit from agency shirking if the agent's preferences are more aligned with the subgroup than with other subgroups.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.