2022
DOI: 10.1111/cup.14361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PRAME immunohistochemistry is useful in differentiating oral melanomas from nevi and melanotic macules

Abstract: Background Oral melanocytic neoplasms pose a diagnostic challenge to pathologists owing to their rarity relative to those in the skin. The utility of PRAME in distinguishing nevi from melanomas has been established in the skin, but limited information exists regarding its usefulness in the oral cavity. Methods Thirty‐five previously diagnosed pigmented oral lesions were retrospectively evaluated with PRAME. The lesions consisted of 16 oral nevi, 10 melanomas, and 10 melanotic macules. Results Strong and diffus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A single case of PAM without atypia was reported to show 4+ PRAME immunoreactivity. [94][95][96] Most (83.7%-100%) mucosal melanomas of sinonasal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, oral cavity, and oropharyngeal origin have consistently been reported to show diffuse immunoreactivity for PRAME, 33,78,[97][98][99] and in one study a trend toward higher PRAME expression in mucosal melanomas with epithelioid versus spindle cell morphology was noted, 100 similar to findings in cutaneous melanomas. Oral nevi and melanotic macules evaluated in one study were completely negative for PRAME.…”
Section: Prame Ihc In Mucosal Melanocytic Lesions and Uveal Melanomasmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A single case of PAM without atypia was reported to show 4+ PRAME immunoreactivity. [94][95][96] Most (83.7%-100%) mucosal melanomas of sinonasal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, oral cavity, and oropharyngeal origin have consistently been reported to show diffuse immunoreactivity for PRAME, 33,78,[97][98][99] and in one study a trend toward higher PRAME expression in mucosal melanomas with epithelioid versus spindle cell morphology was noted, 100 similar to findings in cutaneous melanomas. Oral nevi and melanotic macules evaluated in one study were completely negative for PRAME.…”
Section: Prame Ihc In Mucosal Melanocytic Lesions and Uveal Melanomasmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Oral nevi and melanotic macules evaluated in one study were completely negative for PRAME. 99 In uveal melanomas, PRAME mRNA expression is used as a biomarker for higher risk of metastasis and aggressive tumor behavior. 24,25 immunoreactivity and overall good concordance with PRAME mRNA detection by RT-PCR.…”
Section: Prame Ihc In Mucosal Melanocytic Lesions and Uveal Melanomasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) has recently emerged as a candidate diagnostic biomarker that can be detected using standard immunohistochemistry (1)(2)(3)(4). Studies have shown immunostains for PRAME to represent a means of ancillary histopathology testing with high sensitivity and specificity for melanoma diagnosis, including ambiguous melanocytic neoplasms (1,5,6) and rare subtypes of melanoma (7)(8)(9)(10). This specificity arises because PRAME, a membrane-bound antigen, is not typically expressed in normal cells except for the testis (11,12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PRAME expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) effectively discriminates cutaneous 5,12 , oral mucosal 13 , and uveal 14 melanomas from atypical nevi. Only nuclear staining of PRAME is considered positive, and expression in >75% of malignant cells is observed in 83% of primary cutaneous melanomas, thereby constituting a malignant PRAME expression pattern.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%