1981
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.24.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening and antiscreening by projectile electrons in high-velocity atomic collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Driven by the motivation mentioned above, numerous theoretical (see e.g. McGuire et al (1981); Hippler et al (1987); Lee et al (1992); Fiol et al (2001)) as well as experimental studies have been reported in the literature. A first experimental identification of the (e,e) contribution by exploited its threshold behavior by measuring the velocity dependence of total projectile ionisation cross sections.…”
Section: Projectile-ionisation: a Novel Approach To (E2e)-experimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Driven by the motivation mentioned above, numerous theoretical (see e.g. McGuire et al (1981); Hippler et al (1987); Lee et al (1992); Fiol et al (2001)) as well as experimental studies have been reported in the literature. A first experimental identification of the (e,e) contribution by exploited its threshold behavior by measuring the velocity dependence of total projectile ionisation cross sections.…”
Section: Projectile-ionisation: a Novel Approach To (E2e)-experimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two kind of time orders are possible; the corresponding probabilities are (15) (ionization followed by capture), and (16) (capture followed by ionization). We symmetrize the probabilities by taking the average of P (1) and P (2) . In a similar way, the time order of the different processes was taken into account in deriving the probabilities of higher ionization degrees with and without assuming single electron capture.…”
Section: B Simplified Nctmc Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical and experimental investigations of the screening effect in ion-atom collisions have led to some surprising results [2][3][4][5]. At first glance, one would expect that the cross sections of the collision processes, as compared to the case of bare ion projectiles, are smaller for the impact of partially stripped ions due to the weaker screened Coulomb potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic processes responsible for the slowing down of fast heavy ions in matter are qualitatively understood [1][2][3][4][5][6], but the interest in this problem remains alive for at least two reasons. Ions with velocity v proceed in the solid having, at least temporarily, bound electrons [7][8][9][10][11], even if v > Ζ m, and the distribution of charge is not completely predicted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%