2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.08.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Brain Cancer: Why (Not)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low prevalence of brain tumors also contributes to a correspondingly low positive predictive value, which would further limit the yield of brain tumor screening. Other authors have reached similar conclusions .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The low prevalence of brain tumors also contributes to a correspondingly low positive predictive value, which would further limit the yield of brain tumor screening. Other authors have reached similar conclusions .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Despite years of research, malignant gliomas remain incurable once detected and is the costliest cancer in terms of hospital care and lost productivity. The possibility of asymptomatic brain tumors has received little discussion in the literature and there is an absence of evidence sustaining the clinical utility of brain tumor identification prior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detectable lesion, in terms of clinical and economic advantages [17]. To date, studies have almost exclusively examined samples drawn from patients in whom the brain tumor is already clinically evident, which makes it difficult to distinguish what is a result of the brain tumor itself versus other effects including brain microenvironment disruption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%