Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1998
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
11

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
68
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Such studies should also investigate what screening methods and locations are most acceptable to obese patients (as well as non-obese patients). It may be premature to abandon fecal occult blood testing, which has been shown to decrease colon cancer mortality in prospective randomized controlled trials, [39] and sigmoidoscopy, which has been shown to decrease mortality in case-control trials. [40][41][42] Both of these are less invasive than colonoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies should also investigate what screening methods and locations are most acceptable to obese patients (as well as non-obese patients). It may be premature to abandon fecal occult blood testing, which has been shown to decrease colon cancer mortality in prospective randomized controlled trials, [39] and sigmoidoscopy, which has been shown to decrease mortality in case-control trials. [40][41][42] Both of these are less invasive than colonoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50% for carcinomas). However data are available suggesting that use of FOBT detects colorectal lesions at an earlier stage, and that screened lesions are associated with survival benefits (Towler et al, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis estimates that the reduction in mortality may be in the range of 16% to 20% (Towler et al, 2000) a relatively small benefit. In the 2 above-cited population-based trials the sensitivity of the programme among the participants was 55% in Funen (Gyrd-Hansen et al, 1997) and 51% in Nottingham (Moss et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%