2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for core binding factor gene rearrangements in acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract: Genes encoding the core binding factor (CBF) ␣2 (AML1, RUNX1) and ␤ subunits are amongst the commonest targets of chromosomal rearrangements in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which include t(8;21)(q22;q22) and inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22), leading to formation of AML1-ETO and CBF␤-MYH11 fusion genes, respectively (reviewed in Friedman 1 ). AML cases with t(8;21) and inv(16)/ t(16;16) have been found to have a relatively favorable prognosis, characterized by high complete remission rates associated with low… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14,15 Overall, previous studies suggest that up to 15% of AML with evidence of an underlying AML1-ETO or CBF␤-MYH11 gene fusion lack the typical respective cytogenetic abnormality (reviewed in Ref. 73), thereby providing an important rationale for molecular screening for such rearrangements. This could not only serve to increase the numbers of patients with a fusion gene target who could be monitored for MRD; but also identify those who would be suitable for tailored therapeutic approaches including molecularly targeted strategies, which are likely to play an increasing role in the management of leukemia patients in the future.…”
Section: 71mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Overall, previous studies suggest that up to 15% of AML with evidence of an underlying AML1-ETO or CBF␤-MYH11 gene fusion lack the typical respective cytogenetic abnormality (reviewed in Ref. 73), thereby providing an important rationale for molecular screening for such rearrangements. This could not only serve to increase the numbers of patients with a fusion gene target who could be monitored for MRD; but also identify those who would be suitable for tailored therapeutic approaches including molecularly targeted strategies, which are likely to play an increasing role in the management of leukemia patients in the future.…”
Section: 71mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After selection, the number of CGs was ultimately reduced to three, which were subjected to further analysis ( Figure 1 and Table 2). Oligonucleotide primers and probes were designed employing the GUS (7q21) 11 …”
Section: Primers and Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] The development of PCR methods has resulted in a more accurate diagnosis of balanced translocations, particularly in cases of cryptic translocations, which before were only detectable by molecular methods. [9][10][11] Although appropriate in the diagnostic setting, standard reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methods are less suitable for the evaluation of the disease status during clinical remission, that is detection of minimal residual disease (MRD). Qualitative RT-PCR determinations were therefore only of limited value in the longitudinal follow-up of acute leukemia patients, since many of these patients became PCR negative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetics of disappearance of molecular markers in AML are influenced by the various therapeutic regimens but are mainly different between the various types; for example, while molecular remission is achieved within the first 6 months in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia, PCR markers may persist for several years in apparently cured patients with CBF leukemias [19, 26, 36, 37]. …”
Section: Detection Of Mrd In Aml With Genetic Abnormalities By Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, 40–50% of AML patients have a specific marker detectable by PCR techniques. The major specific molecular markers with an expected frequency of >1% in de novo unselected AML patients are involvement of the MLL gene on chromosome band 11q23 with about 50 partners (10–20%) [19, 24, 25]followed by the core binding factor (CBF) leukemias with AML1/ETO (7–14%) and CBFβ/MYH11 (3–10%) rearrangements [19, 26]. PML/RARα and variant rearrangements (PLZF) reviewed elsewhere in this issue are confined to acute promyelocytic leukemia and occur in 5–10% of de novo AML [19, 27, 28].…”
Section: Detection Of Mrd In Aml With Genetic Abnormalities By Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%