2005
DOI: 10.1002/uog.1917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Down syndrome based on maternal age or fetal nuchal translucency: a randomized controlled trial in 39 572 pregnancies

Abstract: Objectives Nuchal translucency (NT) screening increases antenatal detection of Down syndrome (DS) compared to maternal age-based screening. We wanted to determine if a change in policy for prenatal diagnosis would result in fewer babies born with DS. Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as couples from neighboring countries received NT in very few cases, we decided to exclude non-Danish citizens. In Sweden, a significant effort has been made to document the usefulness of NT in screening for Down syndrome [Saltvedt et al 2005], and NT is offered routinely in Sweden as it is in Denmark. In Norway however, where the majority of the excluded couples came from, NT is not routinely available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as couples from neighboring countries received NT in very few cases, we decided to exclude non-Danish citizens. In Sweden, a significant effort has been made to document the usefulness of NT in screening for Down syndrome [Saltvedt et al 2005], and NT is offered routinely in Sweden as it is in Denmark. In Norway however, where the majority of the excluded couples came from, NT is not routinely available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were provided with a standard set of instructions and asked to complete the templates for three papers of varying quality which were under review at the time: two randomised controlled trials (RCTs)8 9 and one non-randomised, controlled intervention study 10. They rated the relevance of the items on a scale from 1 (totally irrelevant) to 9 (essential item) and clarity of the instructions on a scale from 1 (instructions unclear) to 9 (instructions clear and unambiguous) and estimated the time taken to read the studies and complete the template.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection rate for women under the age of 35 with a triple screen ranges between 57% and 74%, with a constant 5% FPR (3,5). For women above the age of 35 (using similar cutoff values), the sensitivity increases to 87%, but the FPR also balloons to 25% (9).…”
Section: Second Trimester Screeningmentioning
confidence: 96%