Screening for gastric cancer with magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy in asymptomatic individuals

Zhao, Anjing; Qian, Yang‐Yang; Sun, Hui; Hou, Xi; Pan, Jun; Xiao, Lianchun; Zhou, Wei; Chen, Yi-Zhi; Jiang, Xi; Li, Zhao‐Shen; Liao, Zhuan

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2018.05.003

Cited by 66 publications

(77 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recently, magnetically guided CE was evaluated as a screening tool for gastric cancer in 3,182 asymptomatic patients, and seven patients (0.22%) were diagnosed with gastric cancer, accounting for 0.74% (7/948) of patients aged ≥ 50 years, showing the potential role of magnetic CE. 40 In a multicenter blinded study involving 350 patients with upper abdominal complaints, Liao et al compared the detection of focal lesions between robotically assisted magnetically guided CE and conventional EGD. 41 The diagnostic accuracy was comparable between the two examinations, and >95% patients preferred magnetically guided CE because of its noninvasiveness.…”

Section: Other Technical Advancements In Capsule Endoscopy Potential mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Future of Capsule Endoscopy: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Other Technical Advancements

Yang

2020

Clin Endosc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Other Technical Advancements In Capsule Endoscopy Potential mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Future of Capsule Endoscopy: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Other Technical Advancements

Yang

2020

Clin Endosc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since this rate was similar in Korea and Japan (approximately 0.2%), the robotic MCE system can be used as a screening tool for gastric cancer. 32 Because the MCE system shows a good diagnostic detection rate for gastric lesions, it can be a good alternative for EGD in high-risk patients. 33 Furthermore, pediatric patients, who are unable to tolerate EGD, can safely undergo successful gastric examination with the robotic MCE system.…”

Section: Ankon Technology Co Ltdmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this study, gastric cancer was diagnosed in 7 people (0.22%). Since this rate was similar in Korea and Japan (approximately 0.2%), the robotic MCE system can be used as a screening tool for gastric cancer [ 32 ]. Because the MCE system shows a good diagnostic detection rate for gastric lesions, it can be a good alternative for EGD in high-risk patients [ 33 ].…”

Section: Active Locomotion Under Magnetic Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

A New Active Locomotion Capsule Endoscopy under Magnetic Control and Automated Reading Program

Kim²,

Lim

2020

Clin Endosc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Capsule endoscopy (CE) is the first-line diagnostic modality for detecting small bowel lesions. CE is non-invasive and does not require sedation, but its movements cannot be controlled, it requires a long time for interpretation, and it has lower image quality compared to wired endoscopy. With the rapid advancement of technology, several methods to solve these problems have been developed. This article describes the ongoing developments regarding external CE locomotion using magnetic force, artificial intelligence-based interpretation, and image-enhancing technologies with the CE system.

show abstract

“…Capsule endoscopy (CE) has been used for decades and represents a comfortable alternative gastroscopy method . A newly developed method called magnetically controlled CE (MCE) is currently used for gastric examination .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Standing‐type magnetically guided capsule endoscopy versus gastroscopy for gastric examination: multicenter blinded comparative trial

Lai

Wang

Cai

et al. 2019

Digestive Endoscopy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To compare feasibility and safety after gastrointestinal checkup by standing‐type magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (SMCE) and conventional gastroscopy. Methods This was a prospective multicenter, blinded study that compared SMCE with gastroscopy in patients from April 2018 to July 2018. All patients first underwent SMCE and then subsequently had gastroscopy with i.v. anesthesia. We calculated the compliance rates of gastric lesion detection by SMCE using gastroscopy as the standard. Capsule retention rate, incidence of adverse events, and patient satisfaction were documented throughout the study. Results One hundred and sixty‐one patients who completed SMCE and gastroscopy were included in the analysis. Positive compliance rate among SMCE and gastroscopy was 92.0% (95% CI: 80.77%–97.78%). Negative compliance rate was 95.5% (89.80%, 98.52%). Moreover, overall compliance rate was 94.41% (89.65%, 97.41%). Sixty‐four pathological outcomes were identified. Of these 64 outcomes, 50 were detected by both procedures. The gastroscopy method neglected seven findings (such as five erosions, one polyp, and one ulcer). Furthermore, SMCE also overlooked seven lesions (i.e. one erosion, two polyps, one atrophy, and three submucosal tumors). Capsule retention or related adverse events were not reported. Conclusion Standing‐type magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy provides equivalent agreement with gastroscopy and may be useful for screening of gastric illnesses without any anesthesia.

show abstract

Screening for gastric cancer with magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy in asymptomatic individuals

Cited by 66 publications

References 48 publications

The Future of Capsule Endoscopy: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Other Technical Advancements

The Future of Capsule Endoscopy: The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Other Technical Advancements

A New Active Locomotion Capsule Endoscopy under Magnetic Control and Automated Reading Program

Standing‐type magnetically guided capsule endoscopy versus gastroscopy for gastric examination: multicenter blinded comparative trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About