2022
DOI: 10.2337/dbi20-0054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for Type 1 Diabetes in the General Population: A Status Report and Perspective

Abstract: Most screening programs to identify individuals at risk for type 1 diabetes have targeted relatives of people living with the disease to improve yield and feasibility. However, ∼90% of those who develop type 1 diabetes do not have a family history. Recent successes in disease-modifying therapies to impact the course of early-stage disease have ignited the consideration of the need for and feasibility of population screening to identify those at increased risk. Existing population screening programs rely on gen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
5

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
82
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification of longitudinal biomarkers in the form of isletspecific autoantibodies in large studies of at-risk individuals (either from genetically high-risk infants from birth or firstdegree relatives of people with type 1 diabetes [19]) has increased our understanding of the progression to type 1 diabetes and improved the prediction of future type 1 diabetes development. Historically, the at-risk population was identified using HLA typing of type 1 diabetes risk-associated HLA alleles (HLA-DR3-DQ2 and/or HLA-DR4-DQ8, with avoidance of strong protective alleles such as HLA-DR15-DQ6) or by identifying infants or adults at risk because of an affected family member [20].…”
Section: Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of longitudinal biomarkers in the form of isletspecific autoantibodies in large studies of at-risk individuals (either from genetically high-risk infants from birth or firstdegree relatives of people with type 1 diabetes [19]) has increased our understanding of the progression to type 1 diabetes and improved the prediction of future type 1 diabetes development. Historically, the at-risk population was identified using HLA typing of type 1 diabetes risk-associated HLA alleles (HLA-DR3-DQ2 and/or HLA-DR4-DQ8, with avoidance of strong protective alleles such as HLA-DR15-DQ6) or by identifying infants or adults at risk because of an affected family member [20].…”
Section: Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening for risk of T1D is gaining international momentum. While the majority of screening programs remain within the context of research trials, implementation science programs in Europe, the United States, and Australia are actively demonstrating feasibility and acceptability 29 . In time, screening is likely to be embedded in local, regional, and national health systems as the standard of care.…”
Section: Executive Summary: Recommendations and Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Übersicht aktueller internationaler Typ-1-Diabetesrisiko-Screening-Programme. GRS = Genetischer Risiko Score; AA = Autoantikörper (nach Sims E et al [20]).…”
Section: Durch Ein Genetisches Screening Kann Das Risiko Anunclassified