“…describe the reference standard in sufficient detail to permit replication; 115,123,149,165,187,191,195,199,202 six studies reported insufficient detail to allow assessment of the avoidance of test review bias, 115,123,187,195,199,202 and three studies reported insufficient detail to allow assessment of the avoidance of disease progression bias. 165,187,195 The remaining study used direct radionuclide voiding cystography as the reference standard.…”