2010
DOI: 10.2193/2009-405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening Global Positioning System Location Data for Errors Using Animal Movement Characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the approaches discussed in this study may reduce the effect of GPS location error, such as using the MSD to smooth trajectories, using a mean starting location or using a mean or median location per day. A number of modelling approaches have also been developed to remove GPS location errors and improve GPS accuracy, thus reducing the effect of GPS location errors [ 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the approaches discussed in this study may reduce the effect of GPS location error, such as using the MSD to smooth trajectories, using a mean starting location or using a mean or median location per day. A number of modelling approaches have also been developed to remove GPS location errors and improve GPS accuracy, thus reducing the effect of GPS location errors [ 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the animal was captured or recaptured during the 43 day time window around the APEX flights, the first and last days of data collection were excluded from analysis. GPS data were screened for unrealistic movement following the method of Bjørneraas et al [ 80 ], with limiting parameters set to α = 1.5 km/h and cos θ = − 0.97 (velocity and turning angle defining erroneous turnarounds, i.e. spikes in the data), μ = 50 km (possible distance travelled within 20 h) and Δ = 200 km (distance impossible to travel within 20 h; for details see [ 80 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore treated each trajectory between two recapture events as an independent raccoon dog trajectory. Each trajectory was screened for errors following the method described by [ 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%