2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening GPS telemetry data for locations having unacceptable error

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the relationship between location error and DOP can be extremely weak [ 30 ], resulting in either rejection of accurate data or inclusion of inaccurate data. Novel approaches to filtering data by comparing altitude values derived from a digital elevation model (DEM) to those from the GPS device for the same location have been proposed [ 31 ]. This approach was used with ASTER (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) Version 3 Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data, excluding GPS point data that varied by more than 100 m from the DEM in elevation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relationship between location error and DOP can be extremely weak [ 30 ], resulting in either rejection of accurate data or inclusion of inaccurate data. Novel approaches to filtering data by comparing altitude values derived from a digital elevation model (DEM) to those from the GPS device for the same location have been proposed [ 31 ]. This approach was used with ASTER (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) Version 3 Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data, excluding GPS point data that varied by more than 100 m from the DEM in elevation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we suggest that recommendations for handling data with respect to DOP are likely to apply to EHPE as well (for example, see [ 21 , 23 , 24 ]). Recently, Laver et al [ 33 ] suggested evaluation of multiple screening metrics (i.e., DOP, number of satellites, fix dimension (2D or 3D), estimated elevation error) in an information-theoretic framework to determine which screening metrics are best-suited for screening data from individual study sites. For data collected from GPS loggers using SiRF iii chipsets, EHPE is likely to provide an additional metric for such evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each treatment, we calculated the mean, standard deviation (SD), and range of GPS error in each dimension. Dilution of precision (DOP) measures have been suggested as a potential means of filtering inaccurate GPS locations (D'eon and Delparte 2005), although more recent studies have called into question the usefulness of this approach (Recio et al 2011, Laver et al 2015. To illustrate the relationship between DOP and GPS error for these transmitters, we plotted horizontal error and the absolute value of vertical error as a function of horizontal dilution of precision (HDOP) and vertical dilution of precision (VDOP), respectively.…”
Section: Static Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then applied a speed filter (McConnell et al 1992) to remove locations associated with estimated mean minimum horizontal flight speeds !90 km hr À1 , a conservative cutoff speed for filtering outlier locations based on previous speed estimates of migrating Turkey Vultures (Mandel et al 2008, Dodge et al 2014. This had the effect of removing the most extreme outliers without also removing a large number of reasonable locations, a potential issue with filtering based on DOP metrics (Laver et al 2015). To estimate height above ground, we calculated the difference between each postfiltered GPS location and elevation based on U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 1/3 arc-second seamless digital elevation models (DEM;~10 m 2 resolution; http://viewer.…”
Section: Field Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation