2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening metal-organic frameworks for adsorption-driven osmotic heat engines via grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations and machine learning

Abstract: Summary Adsorption-driven osmotic heat engines offer an alternative way for harvesting low-grade waste heat below 80°C. In this study, we performed a high-throughput computational screening based on grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations to identify the high-performance metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) from 1322 computationally ready experimental MOF structures for adsorption-driven osmotic heat engines with LiCl-methanol as the working fluid. Structure-property relationship analysis reveals that MO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five structural descriptors including the largest cavity diameter (LCD), pore-limiting diameter (PLD), volumetric surface area (VSA), void fraction ( ϕ ), density ( ρ ), and an energy descriptor of heat of adsorption ( Q st ), were used to quantitatively describe the structure of the MOF. The reasons for the selection of these six descriptors are as follows: (1) they possessed the strong structure-performance relationships between gas and MOFs, confirmed by many previous works [ 28 , 32 , 34 , 35 ] of high-throughput calculation of MOFs, which means that these six MOF descriptors have a greater possibility of achieving the accuracy prediction in ML models than the thousands of other descriptors that could have been used; (2) these six descriptors could be applied in accuracy prediction of ML, which coincide with many ML works [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]; (3) these descriptors are relatively easy to measure in the experiment, and they can be used directly to guide the synthesis and application of MOF. The LCD and PLD in each CoRE-MOF were estimated using Zeo++ [ 40 ].…”
Section: Models and Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Five structural descriptors including the largest cavity diameter (LCD), pore-limiting diameter (PLD), volumetric surface area (VSA), void fraction ( ϕ ), density ( ρ ), and an energy descriptor of heat of adsorption ( Q st ), were used to quantitatively describe the structure of the MOF. The reasons for the selection of these six descriptors are as follows: (1) they possessed the strong structure-performance relationships between gas and MOFs, confirmed by many previous works [ 28 , 32 , 34 , 35 ] of high-throughput calculation of MOFs, which means that these six MOF descriptors have a greater possibility of achieving the accuracy prediction in ML models than the thousands of other descriptors that could have been used; (2) these six descriptors could be applied in accuracy prediction of ML, which coincide with many ML works [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]; (3) these descriptors are relatively easy to measure in the experiment, and they can be used directly to guide the synthesis and application of MOF. The LCD and PLD in each CoRE-MOF were estimated using Zeo++ [ 40 ].…”
Section: Models and Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…It includes the hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and total solvent accessible surface area of ​​the protein molecule. The calculated surface area is the canonical surface area 94 . The extent to which amino acids interact with the solvent and the protein core is proportional to the surface area exposed to the solvent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSD provides information about the fraction of void space that is occupied by pores of a certain size, and the Q st value reflects the energy information related to the adsorption process. These diverse descriptors with strong structure–performance relationships between guest molecules and zeolites reveal the features of zeolites from various aspects, which could be applied in accuracy prediction of machine learning. ,,, These descriptors are relatively easy to measure, and they can be used directly to guide the synthesis and application of zeolites. In this work, ρ was obtained directly through zeolite crystalline structure, and LCD, PLD, ASA, AV, and PSD were determined by the Zeo++ program, in which the radius of a probe (1.2 Å) was used for ASA and AV, and a bin size of 0.1 Å was used to obtain PSD histograms.…”
Section: Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%