Screening of Metal Oxides and Hydroxides for Arsenic Removal from Water Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Abstract

Arsenic in groundwater is a harmful and hazardous substance that must be removed to protect human health and safety. Adsorption, particularly using metal oxides, is a cost-effective way to treat contaminated water. These metal oxides must be selected systematically to identify the best material and optimal operating conditions for the removal of arsenic from water. Experimental research has been the primary emphasis of prior work, which is time-consuming and costly. The previous simulation studies have been limited to specific adsorbents such as iron oxides. It is necessary to study other metal oxides to determine which ones are the most effective at removing arsenic from water. In this work, a molecular simulation computational framework using molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations was developed to investigate the adsorption of arsenic using various potential metal oxides. The molecular structures have been optimized and proceeded with sorption calculations to observe the adsorption capabilities of metal oxides. In this study, 15 selected metal oxides were screened at a pressure of 100 kPa and a temperature of 298 K for As(V) in the form of HAsO 4 at pH 7. Based on adsorption capacity calculations for selected metal oxides/hydroxides, aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH) 3 ), ferric hydroxide (FeOOH), lanthanum hydroxide La(OH) 3 , and stannic oxide (SnO 2 ) were the most effective adsorbents with adsorption capacities of 197, 73.6, 151, and 42.7 mg/g, respectively, suggesting that metal hydroxides are more effective in treating arsenic-contaminated water than metal oxides. The computational results were comparable with previously published literature with a percentage error of 1%. Additionally, SnO 2 , which is rather unconventional to be used in this application, demonstrates potential for arsenic removal and could be further explored. The effects of pH from 1 to 13, temperature from 281.15 to 331.15 K, and pressure from 100 to 350 kPa were studied. Results revealed that adsorption capacity decreased for the high-temperature applications while experiencing an increase in pressure-promoted adsorption. Furthermore, response surface methodology (RSM) has been employed to develop a regression model to describe the effect of operating variables on the adsorption capacity of screened adsorbents for arsenic removal. The RSM models utilizing CCD (central composite design) were developed for Al(OH) 3 , La(OH) 3 , and FeOOH, having R 2 values 0.92, 0.67, and 0.95, respectively, suggesting that the models developed were correct.

A review on recent advances of cellulose acetate membranes for gas separation

“…Process simulation modulation can provide a valid digital representation of the process. 70 Simulation software creates a dynamic environment for the analysis of the process. MD simulations offer practical methods to model structures and simulate absolute gas separation at a molecular level.…”

Molecular simulation of [P8883][Tf2N] ionic liquid decorated silica in 6FDA-ODA based mixed matrix membrane for enhanced CO2/CH4 separation

“…It offers modeling and simulation environment that can be used to anticipate and understand the connections between molecular structure of a material and its properties while circumventing the difficulty, cost, or time associated with lab-scale manufacturing. 25,26 Several computational studies have been conducted on polymers and MMMs. Velioğlu et al 27 conducted a comprehensive investigation on the molecular simulation of gas transport on three distinct polyimides, namely 4,4-hexafluoroisopropyli-dene-diphthalic anhydride-2,4,6-trimethyl- m -phenylene diamine (6FDA-DAM), 4,4-hexafluoroisopropyli-dene-diphthalic anhydride-4,4-oxydianiline (6FDA-ODA), and 4,4-hexafluoroisopropyli-dene-diphthalic anhydride-2,5-dimethyl- p -phenylenediamine (6FDA-DPX).…”