2018
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] Genotypes for Resistance against Mungbean Yellow Mosaic Virus (MYMV) under Field Condition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of ten screened genotypes of mung bean under natural field conditions against yellow mosaic virus disease, only two genotypes (IPM 02-3 and IPM 0205-7) were found completely free from the disease and plant had maximum chlorophyll content whereas, IPM-409-4 and RMG 991 were found resistant and chlorophyll content was low as compared to highly resistant varieties. Similar result was obtained by Darshan et al [14]. They screened 35 mung bean genotypes against MYMV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Out of ten screened genotypes of mung bean under natural field conditions against yellow mosaic virus disease, only two genotypes (IPM 02-3 and IPM 0205-7) were found completely free from the disease and plant had maximum chlorophyll content whereas, IPM-409-4 and RMG 991 were found resistant and chlorophyll content was low as compared to highly resistant varieties. Similar result was obtained by Darshan et al [14]. They screened 35 mung bean genotypes against MYMV.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As a result, the identified resistance lines can be used for further reactivity confirmation as well as the use of certain progenies in breeding programs to produce Mungbean Yellow Mosaic Virus (MYMV) resistant cultivars with good performance. Similar results were observed byKingsly et al (2015);Sudha et al (2013);Kabi et al (2017) andDharajiya et al (2018).…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The selected model is defined by (1)- (6). In this model the average error (root mean square) in time to flowering prediction is 11.6 days (λ = 50), the resource amount Y needed to flower is 40.27 and the coefficient threshold (1) where F n are climatic control functions and n (2)- (6) describe an added impact of n-th function on plants from different countries of origin. (6) In formulae (2)-(6) two-letter country codes are used instead of indicator variables d for countries of origin: Thailand (TH), India (IN), Afghanistan (AF), Pakistan (PK), Iran (IR), Philippines (PH), Brazil (BR), USA (US), Australia (AU), France (FR), Korea (KR), Turkey (TR), Vietnam (VN), Nigeria (NG), Iraq (IQ), Netherlands (NL), Taiwan (TW), Mexico (MX), Kenya (KE).…”
Section: A Model With the Country Of Origin Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mungbean is often produced in marginal areas or during hot seasons, where abiotic stress limits its productivity. Mungbean yellow mosaic disease (Begomovirus strains), which is transmitted by whitefly ( Bemisia tabaci ) has significant impacts on yields as well harvests [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%