2016
DOI: 10.5958/2395-146x.2016.00026.0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening of Rice Germplasm AgainstUstilaginoidea virens, The Incitant of False Smut

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…were in accordance with the findings of Rani et al (2016). So, these traits could be used further along with disease severity in selection for the breeding program for false smut resistance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…were in accordance with the findings of Rani et al (2016). So, these traits could be used further along with disease severity in selection for the breeding program for false smut resistance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…He observed that rice cultivar Sakha 102 was highly resistant while Giza 171 was susceptible to false smut in different growing seasons. Recently, the high genetic variations among the rice germplasm lines (collected from International Rice Research Institute and PAU) in response to false smut incidence have also been observed (Hiremath et al., 2021; Rani et al., 2016). Hiremath et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rice panicles were sprayed with sterile distilled water served as control and RH maintain 95 % a week. The maximum percent of infection and smut balls per panicle observed in genotype PR-116 (26.56 % and 1.6) (Rani et al 2016) [92] . Nevertheless, the conidia and suspension of hyphal fragments obtained by breaking the mycelia with a high-speed blender were also used as inoculum in some lab (Lu et al 2009) [77] .…”
Section: Inoculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are different types of smut balls, density, and distribution on infected panicles Ikegami (1961) [56] classified smut balls by colour as yellow, yellowish-green, greenishyellow and green; the colour was essentially age-dependent, the aged the balls were, the darker was the colour. Some literature term yellow balls as orange or orange-yellow (Rani, 2014) [92] and green as greenish-black or black (Rani, 2016) [93] . Most literature presented dark balls (green or greenishblack) as the advance stage (by colour change over time) of light-colored (yellow or orange) balls (Rani, 2014) [93] .…”
Section: Types Of Smut Ballmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation