1991
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1991.31591263204.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening potential blood donors at risk for human immunodeficiency virus

Abstract: Even though all blood donated for transfusion is tested for the presence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies, there exists a period of time after infection by the virus before these antibodies can be detected. Blood donated during this window period is capable of transmitting the virus. Therefore, the blood of persons who are at risk for acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) should not enter the blood supply. Over a period of 4 months, 6573 potential blood donors who entered fixed and mobile … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A potential role for improved risk factor detection through pre-donation screening would be to reduce the risks from as yet unknown blood borne diseases if these diseases were associated with other known risk groups. Explicit direct questions instead of indirect references to high-risk behaviours for HIV/AIDS have been shown to increase self-deferral rates in donors at least two-fold [12,13]. It has been estimated that the standard donor health assessment questionnaire may miss as many as 10% of donors who engage in high-risk behaviours [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential role for improved risk factor detection through pre-donation screening would be to reduce the risks from as yet unknown blood borne diseases if these diseases were associated with other known risk groups. Explicit direct questions instead of indirect references to high-risk behaviours for HIV/AIDS have been shown to increase self-deferral rates in donors at least two-fold [12,13]. It has been estimated that the standard donor health assessment questionnaire may miss as many as 10% of donors who engage in high-risk behaviours [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A social desirability effect may be a factor in donating blood, given that individuals are already motivated by altruistic factors, and may want to present themselves as ® tting with whatever description they hold of à good blood donor'. Indeed, previous donors have been found to under-report negative activities, such as blood safety risk behaviours, but to overreport positive activities, such as reading screening information 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…74 When local demographics demand, it may be wise to accommodate donors with materials written in a language that they can understand; otherwise, translators may be necessary. To help ensure that the prospective donor is properly informed, educational material about the donation process is distributed, including information about screening, phlebotomy, and potential donation-related complications.…”
Section: Donor Consent and Additional Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%