Abstract:Abstract. Scripting collaborative argumentation can be effective in helping students understand multiple perspectives in complex, ill-defined domains. We have developed a web-based collaborative learning environment and a collaboration script to support students in discussing and analyzing controversial texts. We present a study in which we varied one element of the script to support critical, elaborative interactions, namely whether or not students take a proponent and/or critic role. Our results suggest that… Show more
“…For example, if the goal is to help learners to get an overview on a topic, graphs are a possible choice to visualize argumentation, whereas matrices can outline the missing pieces between argumentative moves [22]. Argument diagramming can help learners "construct, reconstruct and reflect on arguments" [32] and therefore think deeply about arguments beyond own viewpoints.…”
Section: Argumentation-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scripts can come in many forms. There can be sentence openers that prepare the way for high qualitative argumentation moves [32], guiding questions which point to important conflicts in argumentations or argument diagrams for structuring discussions [25]. By letting the learner choose from possible fitting openers, chances are that sound argumentation is built up that has a stringent and decisive structure.…”
Section: Argumentation Scriptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, especially scripts with a low degree of freedom need to be situated in the zone defined by complementing internal and external scripts and provide options that are sufficient for the task at hand, e.g. neither too many nor too few prompt options to choose from [32].…”
Facebook is a social network very popular among University students for purposes of self-presentation. As social networks support the sharing of ideas, can we facilitate collaborative learning in Facebook? We designed a Facebook app that supports scripting of learners' interaction and the construction of arguments in Facebook. In an empirical study with 128 undergraduate teacher trainees, we investigated how individual preparation and argument structuring influences collaborative learning outcomes. The results show no significant effect of argument structuring and detrimental effects of individual preparation. Learners who were asked to individually construct arguments before joining a discussion in the Facebook app learned significantly less and diverged significantly more from their learning partner in learning outcomes.
“…For example, if the goal is to help learners to get an overview on a topic, graphs are a possible choice to visualize argumentation, whereas matrices can outline the missing pieces between argumentative moves [22]. Argument diagramming can help learners "construct, reconstruct and reflect on arguments" [32] and therefore think deeply about arguments beyond own viewpoints.…”
Section: Argumentation-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scripts can come in many forms. There can be sentence openers that prepare the way for high qualitative argumentation moves [32], guiding questions which point to important conflicts in argumentations or argument diagrams for structuring discussions [25]. By letting the learner choose from possible fitting openers, chances are that sound argumentation is built up that has a stringent and decisive structure.…”
Section: Argumentation Scriptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, especially scripts with a low degree of freedom need to be situated in the zone defined by complementing internal and external scripts and provide options that are sufficient for the task at hand, e.g. neither too many nor too few prompt options to choose from [32].…”
Facebook is a social network very popular among University students for purposes of self-presentation. As social networks support the sharing of ideas, can we facilitate collaborative learning in Facebook? We designed a Facebook app that supports scripting of learners' interaction and the construction of arguments in Facebook. In an empirical study with 128 undergraduate teacher trainees, we investigated how individual preparation and argument structuring influences collaborative learning outcomes. The results show no significant effect of argument structuring and detrimental effects of individual preparation. Learners who were asked to individually construct arguments before joining a discussion in the Facebook app learned significantly less and diverged significantly more from their learning partner in learning outcomes.
“…تال et al, 2000;Schoonenboom, 2008;Popov et al, 2013;Kaunang, 2014;Scheuer et al, 2014;Tsovaltzi et Diziol et al, 2007;Kollar et al, 2007;Weinberger et al, 2005 Kollar et al, 2007;Weinberger et al, 2010;Scheuer et al, .…”