2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SDT: A Virus Classification Tool Based on Pairwise Sequence Alignment and Identity Calculation

Abstract: The perpetually increasing rate at which viral full-genome sequences are being determined is creating a pressing demand for computational tools that will aid the objective classification of these genome sequences. Taxonomic classification approaches that are based on pairwise genetic identity measures are potentially highly automatable and are progressively gaining favour with the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). There are, however, various issues with the calculation of such measures tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
810
0
13

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,399 publications
(825 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
810
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the CLUSTAL W method in SDT v. 1.0 (Muhire et al, 2014) and MEGA5 (Tamura et al, 2011), neighbour-joining phylogenetic dendrograms and percentage pairwise identity of the identified sequences and the representative sequences from the database were generated. For RDP analysis, the begomoviruses were selected according to the criteria followed by George et al (2015) and the sequence accession numbers are listed in Table S4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the CLUSTAL W method in SDT v. 1.0 (Muhire et al, 2014) and MEGA5 (Tamura et al, 2011), neighbour-joining phylogenetic dendrograms and percentage pairwise identity of the identified sequences and the representative sequences from the database were generated. For RDP analysis, the begomoviruses were selected according to the criteria followed by George et al (2015) and the sequence accession numbers are listed in Table S4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for species demarcation, inference from the full length sequences is more meaningful, if considered, since they correspond to biological entities and may represent occurrence of genetic recombination. Pairwise sequence comparison carried out, in this study, using sequence demarcation tool (Muhire et al, 2014), has previously been used for Mastrevirus (Muhire et al, 2013), Curtovirus and more recently for Begomovirus (Brown et al, 2015) of the family Geminiviridae. Sequence based species cutoff alone is accurate and reflects biological differences between viruses belonging to different species (Brown et al, 2015) at least in the case of Begomovirus [Family Geminiviridae] -Bean golden mosaic virus (phloem restricted) and Bean golden yellow mosaic virus (invades mesophyll tissues).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MUSCLE algorithm (Edgar, 2004) was used to align the sequences, with gap penalties (gap open = -400 and gap extend = 0). Pairwise sequence comparison was also carried out using sequence demarcation tool (Muhire et al, 2014). Maximum Likelihood phylogeny was predicted for the isolates under study that grouped into the genus Luteovirus computed with MEGA 5.1 (Tamura et al, 2011) with best-fit nucleotide substitution (GTR+G) model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daha sonra bu CMV izolatına ait elde edilen konsensus dizi NCBI (National Centre for Biotechnology Information)'dan indirilen diğer CMV izolatlarına ait CP sekans verileri ile birlikte filogenetik ağaçların oluşturulmasında kullanılmıştır (Çizelge 1). Bu amaçla CWP17 CP genlerine ait nükleotid dizileri CLC Main Workbench programında ClustalW ile çoklu dizi karşılaştırması yapılarak birbirleriyle ve dünya izolatlarıyla olan nt ve a.a. düzeyindeki benzerlik oranları tespit edilerek Sequence Demarcation Tool, version 1.2 (SDTv1.2) kullanılarak renklendirilmiş matrix olarak elde edilmiştir (Muhire et al 2014). CWP17 izolatının filogenetik ilişkileri de aynı programda Neighbor-joining ve UPGMA metoduyla kiamura iki algoritması uygulanarak 1000 tekrarlı bootstrap analizi ile belirlenmiştir.…”
Section: Benzerlik Filogenetik Ve Evrimsel Farklılık Analizleriunclassified