Se Publicar É Preciso, Avaliar Também É!

Bispo, Marcelo de Souza

doi:10.1590/s0034-759020180409

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Providing opportunities for objective feedback, regardless of level of expertise, is of high priority. In student-led journals, undergraduate students should receive training and mentorship from experienced researchers to learn about and understand the publishing process at the beginning of their careers (9). The Brazilian Medical Students Journal (BMS) is a free scienti c journal published by the International Federation of Medical Students' Associations of Brazil (IFMSA Brazil), a nonpro t, nongovernmental organization (10,11).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Capacity Building in Peer-Review: a Student-led Journal Experience

Campos

Yabrude

Medeiros

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Peer-review plays a pivotal role in optimizing the quality of research articles. However, new strategies need to be implemented in the peer-review system to enhance research rigor, accurate reporting, and data reliability, such as increasing diversity among the reviewers through the inclusion of undergraduate students as reviewers. We aim to report the peer-review policies, procedures, and practices of a medical student-led journal editorial board in 2020, specifically detailing the challenges and the role of the students in the peer-review process. Methods: Through validated online training courses and peer education methodology, the students built capacity regarding the relevance of peer-review, its models, structure, and the publication process. The peer-review process was blinded for authors and reviewers, emphasizing the importance of impartiality and the minimization of identification bias. Guidelines for authors and reviewers were developed to add standardization to the submission and review processes, based on journals’ recommendations and reporting guidelines. Results: From July to August of 2020, the student-led journal received 254 submitted manuscripts from all five Brazilian geographic regions, compared to the 72 submissions received in the previous edition. After review, 50 manuscripts were accepted with major or minor corrections. Discussion: Peer-review contributes to the construction of content, and is the foundation for evidence-based medicine. In addition, it improves ethical thinking, communication skills, and critical appraisal abilities, also desirable in the academic and professional spheres. The medical student peer-review process has numerous benefits and should be promoted and further studied as a potential strategy for building capacity in peer-review.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Capacity Building in Peer-Review: a Student-led Journal Experience

Campos

Yabrude

Medeiros

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Giving freedom to appraisal, whoever is under this speci c duty, is of high priority. In student-led journals, undergraduate students should receive training and mentoring by experienced researchers to realize the publishing process at the beginning of their careers (9).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Capacity Building in Peer Review: a Student-led Journal Experience

Campos¹,

Yabrude²,

Medeiros³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Peer review plays a pivotal role in optimizing articles’ quality. However, in a context of poor methodological publications and unreliable data, it is questionable which strategies to invest in to improve peer reviewing. An excellent start is by enhancing diversity through inclusion of undergraduate students to reviewers. We aim to report the peer reviewing policies, procedures, and practices of a medical student-led journal editorial board in 2020, detailing the challenges and the role of students in building capacity in peer review. Methods: Through validated online training courses and peer education methodology, the students built capacity regarding the relevance of peer review, its models, structure, and publication process. The journal peer-reviewing was blinded for authors and reviewers, pursuing impartiality and minimization of identification bias. To add standardization to the submission and review processes, guidelines for authors and reviewers were developed, based on journals’ recommendations, and reporting guidelines. Results: The journal had 254 submitted manuscripts from all five Brazilian geographic regions during the second semester of 2020, a considerable increase compared to the 72 submissions in the previous edition. After reviewing, 50 articles were accepted to the Brazilian Medical Students’ 7th edition, demanding minor or major corrections.Discussion: Peer review contributes to the construction of content, standing for evidence-based medicine. Besides, it improves ethical, communication, and critical appraisal abilities, also desirable in the academic and professional spheres. Among the benefits and limitations of this medical students' peer review process, there is an interesting strategy to be studied and further promoted.

show abstract

Produtivismo Acadêmico Multinível: Mercadoria Performativa Na Pós-Graduação Em Administração

Silva

2019

Rev. adm. empres.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO O objetivo deste artigo é analisar o produtivismo acadêmico na pós-graduação em Administração no Brasil a partir de uma perspectiva multinível. Inicialmente, aborda-se o surgimento do produtivismo, além de refletir-se sobre o conflito entre o ensino e a pesquisa como uma manifestação do produtivismo. Em seguida, discute-se o fenômeno em três níveis: governamental, institucional e individual, o que pode auxiliar os pesquisadores da área a refletirem sobre o seu impacto na produtividade, nas condições de trabalho e no bem-estar do docente. A partir das reflexões apresentadas no artigo, propõe-se uma definição de produtivismo acadêmico como um ato performativo que institucionaliza um conjunto de ações e comportamentos, caracteriza uma forma de representação social de uma área do conhecimento, delimita um sistema de crenças e valores orientados para uma cultura performativa incorporada socialmente na ação e afeta as condições de trabalho, a saúde, o bem-estar e a carreira de professores que integram a comunidade da área.

show abstract

Se Publicar É Preciso, Avaliar Também É!

Cited by 3 publications

References 7 publications

Capacity Building in Peer-Review: a Student-led Journal Experience

Capacity Building in Peer-Review: a Student-led Journal Experience

Capacity Building in Peer Review: a Student-led Journal Experience

Produtivismo Acadêmico Multinível: Mercadoria Performativa Na Pós-Graduação Em Administração

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About