2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-019-01313-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sea-level rise projections for Sweden based on the new IPCC special report: The ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate

Abstract: New sea-level rise projections for Sweden are presented. Compared to earlier projections, we have here, more carefully, taken regional variations in sea-level rise into consideration. The better treatment of regional variations leads to lower sea-level rise projections for Sweden. However, recent research has also shown that Antarctic ice loss, in high emission scenarios, could be greater than what was believed earlier. Taking also this into account, we find a near cancellation between the increased Antarctic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is somewhat compensated by lower recent estimates of dynamical sea-level rise in the North Atlantic region (Hieronymus and Kalén, 2020). Stronger winds and increased run-off may further contribute to future Baltic sea level rise in the order of some cm (Meier, 2006;Hünicke, 2010;Johansson, 2014;Karabil, 2017;Pellikka et al, 2018).…”
Section: Variability Change and Acceleration Of Baltic Sea Mean Seamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this is somewhat compensated by lower recent estimates of dynamical sea-level rise in the North Atlantic region (Hieronymus and Kalén, 2020). Stronger winds and increased run-off may further contribute to future Baltic sea level rise in the order of some cm (Meier, 2006;Hünicke, 2010;Johansson, 2014;Karabil, 2017;Pellikka et al, 2018).…”
Section: Variability Change and Acceleration Of Baltic Sea Mean Seamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the future, global mean sea level rise is expected to have the largest impact on future Baltic sea level changes (Grinsted, 2015;Hieronymus and Kalén, 2020). It is expected, that most of the future Baltic absolute sea level rise will be strongly linked with corresponding large-scale changes in the North Atlantic and the factors modulating these changes.…”
Section: Variability Change and Acceleration Of Baltic Sea Mean Seamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, 48 scenario simulations for the Baltic Sea were carried out based upon a matrix of (1) four driving ESMs 68,69 ; (2) two greenhouse gas concentration scenarios following RCP 4.5 (medium) and RCP 8.5 (high) 33 ; (3) two nutrient load scenarios following regionalised SSP 1 (a low case scenario, called BSAP 26 ) and SSP 2 (a business-as-usual or REF scenario that takes into account the impact of climate change and the current socioeconomic conditions 29,37,52 ) and (4) three linearly increasing SLR scenarios from the year 2005. The projected mean sea-level changes in the year 2100 are: (scenario 1) 0 m, (scenario 2) the ensemble mean of RCP 4.5 (0.54 m) and RCP 8.5 (0.90 m) IPCC projections 56,81 and (scenario 3) the 95th percentiles of the low-(1.26 m) and high-case (2.34 m) scenarios following Bamber et al 62 (Table 1). Hence, we added another dimension to the ensemble to consider the uncertainties in SLR on global scales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a very optimistic SLR scenario would be that the future SLR simply follows the lower estimate of the past SLR. The mean sea-level conditions (scenario 2) were compiled according to the IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate 56 without considering the glacial isostatic adaptation and the gravitationally induced adjustments for the Baltic Sea region that were made due to preferential melting of the Antarctic ice sheet 81,83 . For the high scenario (scenario 3), experiments with an SLR according to the 95th percentile, as suggested by Bamber et al 62 , were carried out.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%