2015
DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1056541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sea-Level Rise Risk Communication: Public Understanding, Risk Perception, and Attitudes about Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this research and others (e.g. Covi & Kain, 2015) suggest this is not the case. Thus, in messages to the public, scientists need to overtly state the criterial attributes of "good" science and show how their work fits that name.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this research and others (e.g. Covi & Kain, 2015) suggest this is not the case. Thus, in messages to the public, scientists need to overtly state the criterial attributes of "good" science and show how their work fits that name.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Although public opinion polling about the NC public's perceptions of SLR policy or sea-level rise is lacking, a recent study by Covi and Kain (2015) points to the possible influence of the NC-20's intervention on public interpretations of sea-level rise. They exposed subjects in two coastal NC communities to several different forms of SLR fact sheets to measure the subjects' comprehension and response to the topic.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Overpeck et al (2011) this enhanced focus on making climate data accessible to new user groups, who do not possess expert knowledge about climate change or how to interpret climate data, has led to a stronger emphasis on the role of the user and how to represent data in meaningful and useful manners in the development of visual representations of such data. Research points to the issue that, in a context of communication with lay audiences, traditional graphic representations of climate change are generally perceived as abstract and difficult for people to make sense of and relate to (Sheppard 2012;Covi & Kain 2016). Different user groups make use of different meaning-making strategies, and this is particularly salient when comparing expert and non-expert user groups, where scientists, because of their training and experience, have different prerequisites for interpreting information graphics than do lay audiences (Harold et al 2016).…”
Section: Lay Audiences In Climate Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rainfall, storms, and heat waves are expected to become more frequent and intense as a result of climate change [1]. Stakeholders from public, private, and third-sector organizations as well as members of the general public face decisions about how to adapt to these changes [2,3]. To make informed decisions, they need reliable and understandable information about climate change and associated uncertainties [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%