2020
DOI: 10.1080/24751839.2020.1747001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEADer++: social engineering attack detection in online environments using machine learning

Abstract: Social engineering attacks are one of the most well-known and easiest to apply attacks in the cybersecurity domain. Research has shown that the majority of attacks against computer systems was based on the use of social engineering methods. Considering the importance of emerging fields such as machine learning and cybersecurity we have developed a method that detects social engineering attacks that is based on natural language processing and artificial neural networks. This method can be applied in offline tex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of [14] give a good explanation of how social engineering attacks can be detected whereas in [15] and [16] different attack scenarios are delivered. More practical works include the ones in [5] and [6] where the authors use NLP and machine learning to detect attacks successfully.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The authors of [14] give a good explanation of how social engineering attacks can be detected whereas in [15] and [16] different attack scenarios are delivered. More practical works include the ones in [5] and [6] where the authors use NLP and machine learning to detect attacks successfully.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset consists of 1,051 entries and was originally derived from social engineering dialogues as described in [8] and was later extended and used in [6]. The extended dataset from [6] was used which has 4 columns: 1. Intent 2.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations