Sealing ability of Hybrid Root SEAL (MetaSEAL) in conjunction with different obturation techniques

Arı, Hale; Bellí, Sema; Güneş, Betül

doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.02.016

Cited by 15 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Researchers have examined these techniques in terms of issues such as sealing ability (25-27), caused to root strains (23), and the effect of resistance to vertical fracture (12). In this study, which evaluated the effects of filling techniques that include different procedures on vertical fracture resistance, it was found that there is no statistically significant difference between the filling techniques, and that these techniques cannot form a resistance to vertical fracture (p>0.05).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fracture resistance of roots filled with three different obturation techniques

Topçuoğlu

Arslan²,

Keleş³

et al. 2012

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare in vitro root fracture resistance following root canal filling with AH 26 using lateral condensation, BeeFill, and Thermafil techniques. Study Design: Eighty extracted human mandibular premolars with similar dimensions were selected. In order to standardize the roots, measurements were taken in two separate regions of the teeth—at the cemento-enamel junction and 8 mm apically from the junction—buccolingual as well as mesiodistal for every tooth. Teeth were then randomly divided into five groups (n=16). With the exception of the non-prepared group (Group 1), instrumentation was done in all groups. In group 2, instrumentation but no filling was performed; in group 3, the obturation was done with AH 26 + gutta-percha; in group 4, with AH 26 + BeeFill and in group 5, AH 26 + a Thermafil obturator was used. All the roots were mounted vertically in copper rings and filled with acrylic resin, exposing 8 mm of the coronal part. A universal testing machine was used for the strength test. Results: The results were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test. The significance between the groups was tested with Temhane’s T2 test. The results indicate that instrumentation of root canals had a significant effect on fracture resistance (p<0.05). In addition, there were no differences between the root canal obturation techniques; furthermore, these techniques did not create a statistically important resistance to vertical fracture (p>0.05). Conclusions: The results suggest that instrumentation of root canals significantly weakens the tooth structure to fracture and the root canal obturation techniques that are used are not able to form reinforcement. Key words:AH 26, obturation technique, vertical fracture.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fracture resistance of roots filled with three different obturation techniques

Topçuoğlu

Arslan²,

Keleş³

et al. 2012

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous studies have already compared these techniques, though with inconsistent results. [1415161718192021] Endodontic leakage tests may be difficult to standardize, leading to results that are difficult to reproduce and compare. [22]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative analysis of three different filling techniques and the effects of experimental internal resorptive cavities on apical microleakage

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate the sealing abilities of three different gutta-percha techniques in experimentally defective roots (EDR) and non-defective roots (NR).Materials and Methods:Sixty canine teeth were divided into six groups of ten; Group 1, NR + cold lateral condensation (CLC); Group 2, EDR + LC; Group 3, NR + BeeFill; Group 4, EDR + BeeFill; Group 5, NR + Thermafil; and Group 6, EDR + Thermafil. Apical leakage was measured using a computerized fluid filtration meter with a laser system.Results:Statistical analysis revealed that the CLC demonstrated more microleakage in the EDR than in the NR (P < 0.01). Thermafil demonstrated more microleakage in the NR than in the EDR (P < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were found between the BeeFill groups (P > 0.05).Conclusions:The results of this study indicate that internal resorptive cavities can affect the apical sealing properties of different root canal filling techniques, with Thermafil ensuring the lowest apical microleakage.

show abstract

“…4-META is able to promote monomer diffusion into the acid-conditioned and underlying intact dentin and produces functional hybridized dentin with polymerization. 16,17 The formation of the hybrid dentin is the major mechanism of bonding and also the high quality hybridized dentin resists acidic challenges. 18 However, polymerization shrinkage is inherent to methacrlyate resin-based sealers that tend to produce debonding at the resin-dentin interface.…”

Section: Hybrid Root Sealmentioning

confidence: 99%

“Endodontic Sealers”: Current Concepts and Comparative Analysis

Singh¹,

Markan²,

Kaur³

et al. 2015

Dent Open J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main aim of root canal therapy is the removal of microbial contaminants in conjunction with the total closure of the root canal system. Root canal sealers along with solid core material plays a major role in achieving the three dimensional sealing of the root canal system. These sealers are binding agents which are used to adapt the rigid gutta-percha to canal walls and to fill up the voids, accessory canals and irregularities within the canal. Root canal sealers, although used only as adjunctive materials in the obturation of root canals, have been shown to influence the outcome of endodontic treatment. A perfect combination of sealing ability and biocompatibility is what an ideal root canal sealer should possess. This article discusses the current concepts in the usage of different sealers in endodontic therapy and their comparison in order to draw some clinical inferences.

show abstract

Sealing ability of Hybrid Root SEAL (MetaSEAL) in conjunction with different obturation techniques

Cited by 15 publications

References 14 publications

Fracture resistance of roots filled with three different obturation techniques

Fracture resistance of roots filled with three different obturation techniques

Comparative analysis of three different filling techniques and the effects of experimental internal resorptive cavities on apical microleakage

“Endodontic Sealers”: Current Concepts and Comparative Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About