2013
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.mr000041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE

Abstract: Six filters from the first study showed sensitivity of 99.5% to 100% and precision of 16.7% to 21.1%. One type of filter was evaluated by two additional systematic reviews (i.e. externally validated) and found that this retrieved 85.2% to 100% of the articles in the reference standard. Twelve filters from the second study had lower sensitivity (48% to 100%) and much lower precision (0.09% to 4.47%).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Searches were conducted by experienced systematic reviewers (AB and JD) based on established design filters. 26 27 The search strategy combined terms relating to study design (eg, cohort, epidemiological study) and population (eg, knee replacement, knee arthroplasty). Full search strategies are provided in online supplementary appendix 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Searches were conducted by experienced systematic reviewers (AB and JD) based on established design filters. 26 27 The search strategy combined terms relating to study design (eg, cohort, epidemiological study) and population (eg, knee replacement, knee arthroplasty). Full search strategies are provided in online supplementary appendix 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the studies included here generated many different publications some of which may have not been captured by our search strategy and we may have also missed studies altogether. Systematic searches of observational studies are more complex than those limited to RCTs for several reasons including lack of appropriate indexing in the references databases, absence of specialised registries of trials and ambiguity in their definitions . Further limitations are possible due simply to the information provided in the publications reviewed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the search strategy recommended by Cochrane [ 29 ], the search terms were chosen to obtain highly sensitive results: the keywords “electromagnetic field,” "child,” “adolescent,” and “epidemiologic studies” were combined with the Medical Subject Headings and Emtree terms S1 Table . We searched in the international databases of MEDLINE (1946 to January Week 3 2020), EMBASE (1988 to January Week 3 2020), and Web of Science (1995 to January Week 4 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%