2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.106.042011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching for axionlike time-dependent cosmic birefringence with data from SPT-3G

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The degeneracy is sometimes exploited as a means of "selfcalibration" by assuming a standard cosmology in which the true EB vanishes (Keating et al 2013). Although this type of calibration removes sensitivity to an isotropic, static cosmic birefringence, it is still possible to search for cosmic birefringence that is anisotropic (Ade et al 2015;BICEP2 Collaboration et al 2017;Bianchini et al 2020;Namikawa et al 2020) or timevariable (BICEP/ Keck et al 2021Keck et al , 2022Ferguson et al 2022). Through a campaign of modeling and calibration, it is possible to account for instrumental systematics and measure the isotropic, static cosmic-birefringence angle.…”
Section: Cosmic Birefringencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degeneracy is sometimes exploited as a means of "selfcalibration" by assuming a standard cosmology in which the true EB vanishes (Keating et al 2013). Although this type of calibration removes sensitivity to an isotropic, static cosmic birefringence, it is still possible to search for cosmic birefringence that is anisotropic (Ade et al 2015;BICEP2 Collaboration et al 2017;Bianchini et al 2020;Namikawa et al 2020) or timevariable (BICEP/ Keck et al 2021Keck et al , 2022Ferguson et al 2022). Through a campaign of modeling and calibration, it is possible to account for instrumental systematics and measure the isotropic, static cosmic-birefringence angle.…”
Section: Cosmic Birefringencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lighter oscillating result is the exact bound, and the median result, g φγ < (2.4×10 −11 GeV −1 )×(m φ /10 −21 eV), is shown in darker red. The median deterministic bounds for Polarbear, BICEP, and SPT are the dashed lines: these are the published results in [19] and [20]. The green 'washout' bound was calculated in F19 from the lack of CMB polarization suppression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This signal has been constrained by other CMB experiments: BICEP/Keck, in [18,19] (the latter hereafter BK22), and the South Pole Telescope (SPT) in [20] (hereafter SPT22). Our analysis is similar to these analyses, with two primary differences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The signal here appears not in the CMB power spectrum but rather in timeseries data, which is why it required dedicated analyses within the collaborations. Three CMB experiments have taken up this idea since it was proposed: BICEP/KECK [706,707], the South Pole Telescope (SPT) [708], and POLARBEAR [709]. The latter has also very recently improved their best constraint by looking at polarisation oscillations towards the direction of the Crab nebula [710].…”
Section: Pos(cosmicwispers)040 Pos(cosmicwispers)040mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Axion cosmology Ciaran A. J. O'Hare here with more data because the local effect is not cosmic-variance limited. A projection for the potential ultimate reach of the next-generation ground-based CMB surveys, CMB-S4, is also shown-taken from SPT's study [708].…”
Section: Pos(cosmicwispers)040 Pos(cosmicwispers)040mentioning
confidence: 99%