2014
DOI: 10.1038/srep05547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching for superspreaders of information in real-world social media

Abstract: A number of predictors have been suggested to detect the most influential spreaders of information in online social media across various domains such as Twitter or Facebook. In particular, degree, PageRank, k-core and other centralities have been adopted to rank the spreading capability of users in information dissemination media. So far, validation of the proposed predictors has been done by simulating the spreading dynamics rather than following real information flow in social networks. Consequently, only mo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
289
3
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(316 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
8
289
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…analyses of social contagion for online social networks, such as Twitter and Facebook (45,46), individuals' proximity to the core of the network is not predictive of social influence (generalized linear model fit with weighted k-core: likelihood ratio test, P = 0:18; SI Appendix, Table S2). In addition, individuals with a high betweenness centrality are less likely to be influential (SI Appendix).…”
Section: Predicting Behavioral Cascades and The Relationship Between mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…analyses of social contagion for online social networks, such as Twitter and Facebook (45,46), individuals' proximity to the core of the network is not predictive of social influence (generalized linear model fit with weighted k-core: likelihood ratio test, P = 0:18; SI Appendix, Table S2). In addition, individuals with a high betweenness centrality are less likely to be influential (SI Appendix).…”
Section: Predicting Behavioral Cascades and The Relationship Between mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These influential spreaders identification algorithms are applied on different topological network representation. Then the effectiveness of different identification algorithms on different topological network representations are evaluated by comparing ranking list obtained generated by each identification algorithm with ranking list obtained by tracking diffusion links in real spreading dynamics of information [18]. The findings of this paper (presented in result section) are significant in understanding information spread with the real OSNs and on selecting the most efficient algorithms for identifying influential spreaders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Classical centrality measures, such as degree, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality and eigenvector centrality, are direct methods for recognizing the influential spreaders. However, closeness centrality and betweenness centrality have very high computational complexity, hence, it is not suitable to be applied into very largescale OSNs [18,19]. This limitation has made impractical for large OSNs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations