2016
DOI: 10.14237/ebl.7.1.2016.621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Searching for Symbolic Value of Cattle: Tropical Livestock Units, Market Price, and Cultural Value of Maasai Livestock

Abstract: We examine metabolic, market, and symbolic values of livestock relative to cultural “positioning” by gender, marriage, and household production among Maasai people in Simanjiro, Tanzania to assess local “proximate currencies” relevant for “cultural success.” Data from mixed methods ethnographic research include qualitative interviews since 2012, observation of 85 livestock market sales in 2013 and 2015, and 37 short key informant interviews in 2015. We examine fit between market values, Tropical Livestock Unit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sale of small-stock, in contrast, was associated with lower probability of professional vet consultation ( Table 8 ). This is consistent with different roles for cattle and small-stock in Maasai production systems [ 37 , 39 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sale of small-stock, in contrast, was associated with lower probability of professional vet consultation ( Table 8 ). This is consistent with different roles for cattle and small-stock in Maasai production systems [ 37 , 39 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Among Maasai, cattle are particularly valued, but small-stock are still important [ 37 ]. Cattle provide milk for daily consumption and meat for occasional ritual meals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, while livestock may be an important economic asset, household herds and their well-being may hold cultural significance beyond their market, income and consumption value (Quinlan et al, 2016).…”
Section: [Insert Table 3 Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models also allowed researchers to identify the factors that influence farmer income and to account for potential differences and project effects across the two sites [41]. Based on the relevant literature [1,[42][43][44], twelve indicators were selected as the main predictors of farmers' income in the Nyando river basin: X1 (treatment, i.e., membership in project or control group), X2 (livestock ownership; specifically, the number of livestock owned was converted to tropical livestock units (TLU) per household member [45,46]), X3 (farm mechanization; specifically, if a tractor was used), X4 (average hours worked per week), X5 (gender of the household head), X6 (size of land operated), X7 (farming experience through number of years farmed), X8 (crop species richness), X9 (household size), X10 (importance of farming for household income; specifically. if farming was the main source of income), X11 (farming practices; specifically, if horticulture was practiced), and X12 (legal status of the land operated; specifically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common species of livestock reared were indigenous chickens (86% of the households), with cattle, sheep, and goats being the other commonly kept livestock. Livestock populations were converted into tropical livestock units (TLU) [45,46]. The overall mean TLU was 2.77, with higher values (p < 0.01) found in the Middle site.…”
Section: Household and Livelihood Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%