2018
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-2018-228
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEAS5: The new ECMWF seasonal forecast system

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we describe SEAS5, ECMWF’s fifth generation seasonal forecast system, which became operational in November 2017. Compared to its predecessor, System 4, SEAS5 is a substantially changed forecast system. It includes upgraded versions of the atmosphere and ocean models at higher resolutions, and adds a prognostic sea ice model. Here, we describe the configuration of SEAS5 and summarise the most noticeable results from a set of diagnostics including biases, variability, teleconnections and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
178
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
8
178
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the benefits of increased atmospheric resolution for seasonal prediction skill are less clear. Operational seasonal prediction systems are now being at resolutions well beyond one degree (e.g., MacLachlan et al, 2014;Johnson et al, 2018). The effects on prediction skill from further increases in resolution in the atmosphere (e.g., Jung et al, 2012;Jia et al, 2015;Zhu et al, 2015;Prodhomme et al, 2016) or ocean (e.g., Kirtman et al, 2017) is an active research topic and it is not known whether this outweighs the benefits of larger ensemble size (e.g., Scaife et al, 2014;Doi et al, 2019), increased vertical resolution (e.g., Marshall and Scaife, 2010;Butler et al, 2016) or improved initial conditions (e.g., Kumar et al, 2015;Nie et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the benefits of increased atmospheric resolution for seasonal prediction skill are less clear. Operational seasonal prediction systems are now being at resolutions well beyond one degree (e.g., MacLachlan et al, 2014;Johnson et al, 2018). The effects on prediction skill from further increases in resolution in the atmosphere (e.g., Jung et al, 2012;Jia et al, 2015;Zhu et al, 2015;Prodhomme et al, 2016) or ocean (e.g., Kirtman et al, 2017) is an active research topic and it is not known whether this outweighs the benefits of larger ensemble size (e.g., Scaife et al, 2014;Doi et al, 2019), increased vertical resolution (e.g., Marshall and Scaife, 2010;Butler et al, 2016) or improved initial conditions (e.g., Kumar et al, 2015;Nie et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of SEAS5's configuration and performance, including stratospheric biases, are documented in Johnson et al . ().…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…According to Johnson et al . (), fig. 20, both regions lie at the boundary of skilful tropical predictions (DJF, 1‐month lead).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally used for the interface between weather and climate (Palmer et al ., ; Shukla et al ., ), the word “seamless” now refers to efforts of unifying prediction systems (initialization, parametrization, numerics) across all time‐scales. This study emphasizes predictions ranging from days to seasons, specifically from lead times of 1 to 180 days, as produced by the latest seasonal prediction system SEAS5 of the European Centre of Medium‐range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) (Johnson et al ., ). Potential atmospheric predictability at seasonal time‐scales is grounded in, mostly coupled, atmosphere–ocean processes, such as the El‐Niño–Southern Oscillation or the Madden–Julian Oscillation, that are themselves predictable at those time‐scales (Rowell, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%