1983
DOI: 10.1029/jc088ic03p01937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEASAT synthetic aperture radar (SAR) response to lowland vegetation types in eastern Maryland and Virginia

Abstract: Examination of SEASAT SAR images of eastern Maryland and Virginia reveals botanical distinctions between vegetated lowland areas and adjacent upland areas. Radar returns from the lowland areas can be either brighter or darker than returns from the upland forests. Scattering models and scatterometer measurements predict an increase of 6 dB in backscatter from vegetation over standing water. This agrees with the SCWigital number (DN) increase observed in the digital SEASAT data. The brightest areas in the Chicka… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mangroves are, however, inundated regularly and as the underlying surface (whether soil or water) is smooth, specular scattering often dominates. In such cases, specularly reflected incident microwaves travelling at right angles (orthogonal) between tree trunks, for example, and the ground can interact and produce a strong doublebounce effect (MacDonald, 1980;Krohn et al, 1983;Ormsby et al, 1985;Imhoff, 1995a;Simard et al, 2002), which often increases the backscattering coefficient beyond the normal level of saturation (Mougin et al, 1999;Proisy et al, 2002). However, specular reflection depends on the architecture of the trees as well as the roughness of the underlying surface and is not observed in all mangroves.…”
Section: Sar Remote Sensing Of Mangroves: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Mangroves are, however, inundated regularly and as the underlying surface (whether soil or water) is smooth, specular scattering often dominates. In such cases, specularly reflected incident microwaves travelling at right angles (orthogonal) between tree trunks, for example, and the ground can interact and produce a strong doublebounce effect (MacDonald, 1980;Krohn et al, 1983;Ormsby et al, 1985;Imhoff, 1995a;Simard et al, 2002), which often increases the backscattering coefficient beyond the normal level of saturation (Mougin et al, 1999;Proisy et al, 2002). However, specular reflection depends on the architecture of the trees as well as the roughness of the underlying surface and is not observed in all mangroves.…”
Section: Sar Remote Sensing Of Mangroves: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…SAR, on the other hand, is known to be sensitive to ooded vegetation, as observed already 20 years ago in both SEASAT and Shuttle Imaging Radar-A (SIR-A) data (MacDonald et al 1980, Krohn et al 1983, Ormsby et al 1985. L-band (23.5 cm) or longer wavelength microwave signals penetrate the forest canopy and Figure 2.…”
Section: Site Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As the leaves of the trees generally are too small to be detected, L-band signals penetrate deeper into the canopy to interact with the branches, as well as to provide information about the stems and the underlying ground surface. This property makes L-band SAR particularly significant in the wetland context, for distinction between flooded and non-flooded forest (Krohn et al, 1983;Hess et al, 1995). L-band has also proved useful for mapping of irrigated rice (Rosenqvist, 1999).…”
Section: Synthetic Aperture Radarmentioning
confidence: 98%