2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2020.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Season, Classifier, and Spatial Resolution Impact Honey Mesquite and Yellow Bluestem Detection using an Unmanned Aerial System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work in south Texas compared the classification results with different flying altitude over noxious plant honey mesquite and yellow bluestem in south Texas, and the object-based RF classifier outperformed other models tested in the study [18]. The previous study also suggested that flying altitude at approximately 100 m is most suitable for mapping honey mesquite [18]. The highest overall accuracy of mapping mesquite is 87% for flying altitude at 100 m in April, which was lower than this study.…”
Section: Relevent Work Comparisoncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previous work in south Texas compared the classification results with different flying altitude over noxious plant honey mesquite and yellow bluestem in south Texas, and the object-based RF classifier outperformed other models tested in the study [18]. The previous study also suggested that flying altitude at approximately 100 m is most suitable for mapping honey mesquite [18]. The highest overall accuracy of mapping mesquite is 87% for flying altitude at 100 m in April, which was lower than this study.…”
Section: Relevent Work Comparisoncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The results from this study are comparable to similar studies. Previous work in south Texas compared the classification results with different flying altitude over noxious plant honey mesquite and yellow bluestem in south Texas, and the object-based RF classifier outperformed other models tested in the study [18]. The previous study also suggested that flying altitude at approximately 100 m is most suitable for mapping honey mesquite [18].…”
Section: Relevent Work Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the popularization of UAVs, the target detection, attitude control, and recognition detection of UAVs have been widely studied. Jackson et al (2020) conducted plant detection and mapping in Texas by UAVs at altitudes of 30, 60, and 100 m. They found that low spatial resolution (100 m altitude flight, 12 cm pixel resolution) provided less noise and more generalization capability for image classification methods. Yamazaki et al (2020) designed a UAV human search system combined with array microphones to detect the human body and evaluated the accuracy of the method through experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%