2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal changes in metal and nutrient fluxes across the sediment-water interface in tropical mangrove creeks in the Amazon region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although limited, existing studies on the sulfidation of pure Fh ,, and influence of coprecipitated OM on Fe(II)-catalyzed Fh transformation , suggest that the anoxic reductive dissolution of ferrihydrite and its pyritization under OM loading depend on various factors, including OM properties, C/Fe ratio, S(-II)/Fe ratio, and pH. , Yet, few studies have systematically evaluated the impact of the abovementioned factors as well as their interactions on the sulfidation of Fh–OM coprecipitates. In porewaters of OM-rich wetland and estuarine sediments, both C/Fe molar ratios (0.2–25.0) , and DS(-II) concentrations (0.023–5.0 mM) have wide spectrum. Considering the controlling effect of the S(-II)/Fe molar ratio in pure Fh sulfidation, , we therefore hypothesize that the kinetics and mineralogical evolution pathways of Fh–OM sulfidation depend on the interrelated effects of carbon and sulfur loadings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although limited, existing studies on the sulfidation of pure Fh ,, and influence of coprecipitated OM on Fe(II)-catalyzed Fh transformation , suggest that the anoxic reductive dissolution of ferrihydrite and its pyritization under OM loading depend on various factors, including OM properties, C/Fe ratio, S(-II)/Fe ratio, and pH. , Yet, few studies have systematically evaluated the impact of the abovementioned factors as well as their interactions on the sulfidation of Fh–OM coprecipitates. In porewaters of OM-rich wetland and estuarine sediments, both C/Fe molar ratios (0.2–25.0) , and DS(-II) concentrations (0.023–5.0 mM) have wide spectrum. Considering the controlling effect of the S(-II)/Fe molar ratio in pure Fh sulfidation, , we therefore hypothesize that the kinetics and mineralogical evolution pathways of Fh–OM sulfidation depend on the interrelated effects of carbon and sulfur loadings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissolved [Nd] and [Hf] of the Pará River endmember (Sal = 0.3) are 1036 pmol kg -1 and 13.4 pmol kg -1 , respectively, and are thus significantly higher than 502 pmol kg -1 and 12.3 pmol kg -1 of the Amazon River freshwater endmember (Sal = 0.2) (Supplementary Data 1 ). These higher concentrations are likely a result of the overall lower pH of the Pará River pH of 6.2–7.4 (Amazon River: 6.8–7.3) 27 and/or feeding by tributaries from the mangrove forests, which is consistent with high trace metal export from the Amazonian mangrove forest areas 28 30 . In addition, parent rock characteristics and floodplain supply may play a role given that elevated REY concentrations in the waters exiting the floodplain have been observed in the Amazon Basin 31 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The sampling technology for pore-water below the sediment has also been developed. Sediment pore-water usually reflects the trend of seafloor geological changes, which is of great significance for marine geochemical changes and deep-sea resource acquisition (Matos et al, 2022). The main way to obtain pore-water in two ways: One is the non-in-situ pore-water sampling technology, as shown in Figure 9, through the first collection of sediments and then through pressure filtration (Bender et al, 1987), centrifugation (Carignan et al, 1985) or vacuum filtration (Dickens and others, 2007) to separate the porewater.…”
Section: Main Content Of Pore-water Sampling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%