2003
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2003.11511622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal patterns of vegetative growth and competition with reproductive sinks in peach (Prunus persica)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
32
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3) was probably due to increased competition for photoassimilates among fruit themselves and, also, between the fruit and other organs that were developing at the same time (Grossman & DeJong, 1994). High cropping peach trees generally have reduced vegetative growth (Berman & DeJong, 2003) and root growth (Chalmers & Van den Ende, 1975). Results in support of this were found in experiments with late-maturing peach trees in both potted (López et al, 2008) and field grown (Ben Mimoun & DeJong, 2006) conditions, in which root growth was significantly higher in defruited than in commercial crop load treatments.…”
Section: Crop Load and Peach Tree Growthsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…3) was probably due to increased competition for photoassimilates among fruit themselves and, also, between the fruit and other organs that were developing at the same time (Grossman & DeJong, 1994). High cropping peach trees generally have reduced vegetative growth (Berman & DeJong, 2003) and root growth (Chalmers & Van den Ende, 1975). Results in support of this were found in experiments with late-maturing peach trees in both potted (López et al, 2008) and field grown (Ben Mimoun & DeJong, 2006) conditions, in which root growth was significantly higher in defruited than in commercial crop load treatments.…”
Section: Crop Load and Peach Tree Growthsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The results of agronomic scenarios indicate that, as reported under field conditions by many authors (Berman and DeJong 2003;Marsal et al 2003;Nicolás et al 2006), fruit load exerted a strong influence on the final fruit average dry mass and yield simulated by our model. Other logical results were also obtained, such as the positive effects of thinning on fruit quality and the negative effects of pest attacks on fruit yield and quality, especially when attacks were severe or not treated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…One interesting result was the lack of an effect of the initial relative growth rate of fruits on fine roots, although several authors had noted a possible competition between fruits and roots (Miller and Walsh 1988;Berman and DeJong 2003;Abrisqueta et al 2008). Only the parameter SReq (shoot:root ratio at equilibrium) exerted a strong influence on fine roots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It was found that non-structural carbohydrates (sugars and starch) were not influenced by elevated [CO 2 ] in stems and lateral roots. On the other hand, carbon partitioning in stems appears to be essentially influenced by sink demands from secondary radial growth (Berman and Dejong 2003). Wood forms not only the major supporting tissue of all the spermatophytes (Höll 2000), as secondary plant tissue produced by the vascular cambium, it also acts as a consistent sink for products transferred from the sources in the leaves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%