2009
DOI: 10.1134/s1021443709050045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal structural and functional changes in the photosynthetic apparatus of evergreen conifers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with previous works (Stefanowska et al 2002, Maslova et al 2009, Muller et al 2009), pronounced and reversible modifications in the ultrastructure of leaf cells and chloroplasts occurred during winter de‐acclimation. Our results comprise evidence of this postulated hypothesis since ultrastructural changes were found when winter‐acclimated and recovered leaves were compared (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In agreement with previous works (Stefanowska et al 2002, Maslova et al 2009, Muller et al 2009), pronounced and reversible modifications in the ultrastructure of leaf cells and chloroplasts occurred during winter de‐acclimation. Our results comprise evidence of this postulated hypothesis since ultrastructural changes were found when winter‐acclimated and recovered leaves were compared (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…There is evidence that the pro cess of Vx deepoxidation is constrained in a feedback manner by the production of Zx or by rearrangements of lamellar membranes [48]. Heterogeneity was also observed for Zx, a second VC component: a part of Zx content did not participate in the backward reaction of the cycle [58]. At the same time, the secondary caro tenoid rhodoxanthin, produced upon nonenzymatic oxidation of Zx, was accumulated.…”
Section: Structual-functional Organization and Heterogeneity Of Violamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Practical and theoretical tests presented by Kubínová et al (2014) demonstrated that the frequently used method for chloroplast number estimation by counting profiles of particles from 2D sections yielded biased estimates (e. g. Boffey et al, 1979;Miyazawa and Terashima, 2001;Sam et al, 2003;Zechmann et al, 2003;Wang et al, 2004;Hayashida et al, 2005;Oguchi et al, 2005;Teng et al, 2006;Image Anal Stereol 2017;35:187-205 Gopi et al, 2008;Maslova et al, 2009;Jin et al, 2011;Simon et al, 2013) and that the results may be one order of magnitude different from the real chloroplast numbers. Another possible method is to count the chloroplasts in cells directly during focusing through the specimen using conventional light microscopy (Ellis and Leech, 1985;Bockers et al, 1997) which can be applied if entire cells can be focused through and the chloroplasts are sparsely distributed in cells.…”
Section: Number Of Mesophyll Cells and Chloroplastsmentioning
confidence: 99%