2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12040-012-0194-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal variability in aerosol optical and physical characteristics estimated using the application of the Ångström formula over Mohal in the northwestern Himalaya, India

Abstract: Investigations of aerosol optical and physical characteristics using the application ofÅngström formula and second order polynomial fit were carried out from April 2006 to March 2009 at Mohal in the Kullu valley. The measurements of spectral aerosol optical depths (AODs) were conducted using multiwavelength radiometer (MWR). The AOD at 0.5 μm wavelength on daily basis (mean ± standard deviation) for the entire three-year study period is obtained as 0.24 ± 0.08. Seasonal variations show the highest AOD at 0.5 μ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14] In the present study, values of AODs remained much higher throughout the year, particularly when it is compared with the average AOD values observed at high-altitude Indian stations such as Leh and Hanle , Nainital [Sagar et al, 2004;Ram et al, 2010], Kullu [Guleria et al, 2012], and with the oceanic regions such as Arabian Sea [Satheesh et al, 2006a] and Bay of Bengal [Moorthy et al, 2003;Satheesh et al, 2006b;Beegum et al, 2012]. The AOD at Delhi is slightly higher compared to AODs at some of the other Indian stations like Ahmedabad [Ganguly et al, 2006], Pune [Pandithurai et al, 2007;Dani et al, 2012], Visakhapatnam [Niranjan et al, 2011], Bangalore [Babu et al, 2002;Vinoj et al, 2004], and Trivandrum [Moorthy et al, 2007], but quite comparable with the values at the IGP stations such as Kanpur , Kharagpur [Niranjan et al, 2006], and Bhubneshwar [Das et al, 2009].…”
Section: Climatology Of Aod and Angstrom Parametersmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…[14] In the present study, values of AODs remained much higher throughout the year, particularly when it is compared with the average AOD values observed at high-altitude Indian stations such as Leh and Hanle , Nainital [Sagar et al, 2004;Ram et al, 2010], Kullu [Guleria et al, 2012], and with the oceanic regions such as Arabian Sea [Satheesh et al, 2006a] and Bay of Bengal [Moorthy et al, 2003;Satheesh et al, 2006b;Beegum et al, 2012]. The AOD at Delhi is slightly higher compared to AODs at some of the other Indian stations like Ahmedabad [Ganguly et al, 2006], Pune [Pandithurai et al, 2007;Dani et al, 2012], Visakhapatnam [Niranjan et al, 2011], Bangalore [Babu et al, 2002;Vinoj et al, 2004], and Trivandrum [Moorthy et al, 2007], but quite comparable with the values at the IGP stations such as Kanpur , Kharagpur [Niranjan et al, 2006], and Bhubneshwar [Das et al, 2009].…”
Section: Climatology Of Aod and Angstrom Parametersmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Observations on the vertical profile of aerosol and their transport at high altitude regions have also been made by Solanki et al ( 2013 ), Kumar et al ( 2018a , b ); however, more intensive measurements are still needed over the Himalayas which is nearly a data-void region. The Indian Himalaya is topographically very fragile and ecologically very delicate, and further due to the variety of the ecosystem, surface conditions and aerosol properties, in situ observations of aerosols in this part of the Himalayas are therefore very important (Guleria et al, 2011 , 2012 ). Our study mainly focuses on the aerosol variability at various scales, utilizing AOD and AE over a higher-altitude region i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common atmospheric processes are turbulent mixing, evaporation, convection, and atmospheric transport (Derimian et al, 2006;Ramachandran and Cherian, 2008;Guleria et al, 2011aGuleria et al, , 2011bVinoj et al, 2014). This result leads to large variations in their size distribution (Kedia and Ramachandran, 2009;Guleria et al, 2012). On the basis of their source strength they are classified as fine mode (r < 0.1 m), accumulation mode (0.1 m ≤ r < 1.0 m) and coarse mode (r ≥ 1.0 m) (Junge, 1963).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%