2012
DOI: 10.1684/mst.2012.0123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal variability of intestinal helminths and Schistosoma haematobium in a rural area of the Sahel in Mali

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This observed prevalence is low compared to previous studies with most studies conducted in different parts of southern Mauritania, known to be the main endemic area for schistosomiasis [16, 17, 30]. Our observed prevalence is considerably lower than that reported from other studies conducted in different parts of the Sahel, such as Burkina Faso (8.8%) [31], Mali (7.6%) [32] and Sudan (8.6%) [33]. Various ecological features might explain these differences, as they influence the transmission of schistosomiasis [34].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…This observed prevalence is low compared to previous studies with most studies conducted in different parts of southern Mauritania, known to be the main endemic area for schistosomiasis [16, 17, 30]. Our observed prevalence is considerably lower than that reported from other studies conducted in different parts of the Sahel, such as Burkina Faso (8.8%) [31], Mali (7.6%) [32] and Sudan (8.6%) [33]. Various ecological features might explain these differences, as they influence the transmission of schistosomiasis [34].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Similarly, the prevalence of STHs was similar during rainy and non‐rainy seasons. A higher prevalence of intestinal helminths during and towards the end of the monsoon was reported in some studies .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, other studies conducted in other parts of Nigeria, such as Maiduguri (northeastern), Anambra (southeastern), Dutsen-Ma (northwestern), and Kano (northwestern), have observed a lower prevalence of 14.5%, 15.7%, 17.3%, and 17.8%, respectively [6,[25][26][27]. A lower prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis has also been reported by other authors from different parts of the world, such as Gbalégba [3] in Mauritania, Ouedraogo [28] in Burkina Faso, Niangaly [29] in Mali, Kapito-Tembo [7] in Malawi, and Sudan [30], at 4.0%, 7.6%, 8.8%, 10.4%, and 13.8%, respectively. The difference in urinary schistosomiasis infection between the present and previous studies might be attributable to variations in geographical location and environmental factors across the countries [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%