2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(02)00147-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal variation of moisture content in unsaturated sandstone inferred from borehole radar and resistivity profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
129
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recorded EM signal provides information on the electrical permittivity and the electrical conductivity of the investigated formation, that can be related to velocity and the attenuation of the EM wave, respectively (Annan, 2005). To date, published field studies using crosshole GPR only include sediments with low electrical conductivity, e.g., unconsolidated sands (Cassiani et al, 2006;Irving et al, 2007;Haarder et al, 2015;Looms et al, 2008;Klotzsche et al, 2010;Gueting et al, 2015), sandstone (Binley et al, 2002), and chalk (Keskinen et al, 2017). In general, clayey environments have been avoided as the attenuation of the EM signal reduces the signal strength and thereby the possible distance between boreholes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recorded EM signal provides information on the electrical permittivity and the electrical conductivity of the investigated formation, that can be related to velocity and the attenuation of the EM wave, respectively (Annan, 2005). To date, published field studies using crosshole GPR only include sediments with low electrical conductivity, e.g., unconsolidated sands (Cassiani et al, 2006;Irving et al, 2007;Haarder et al, 2015;Looms et al, 2008;Klotzsche et al, 2010;Gueting et al, 2015), sandstone (Binley et al, 2002), and chalk (Keskinen et al, 2017). In general, clayey environments have been avoided as the attenuation of the EM signal reduces the signal strength and thereby the possible distance between boreholes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the available geophysical techniques, time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) is one of the most popular methods . Given its sensitivity to numerous soil/rock properties, ERT has been applied in various contexts, such as salt-tracer experiments (Doetsch et al, 2012b;Robert et al, 2012), dynamics of infiltration and saturation in the vadose zone (Binley et al, 2002;Koestel et al, 2008), monitoring of permafrost (Krautblatter et al, 2010;Supper et al, 2014), interaction between surface and groundwater (Coscia et al, 2011), and more recently to CO 2 sequestration (Carrigan et al, 2013) and heat-tracing experiments Arato et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative interpretation remains indeed difficult without additional information, generally in the form of a few additional in situ measurements or/and the use of additional geophysical methods (for instance GPR or induced polarization). Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) has proven its efficiency to image and/or monitor spatial phenomena [43] such as salt water intrusions [44,45], variations in moisture content (e.g., [46,47]), biodegradation of hydrocarbons (e.g., [48,49]) and salt tracer experiments (e.g., [50,51] and references therein). An in-depth review of electrical properties of rocks can be found in Schön [52] or Revil et al [53], whereas a description of electrical methods can be found in Binley and Kemna [54].…”
Section: Electrical Resistivity Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%