1995
DOI: 10.1016/0045-6535(95)00006-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal variations of terpene emission from trees and influence of temperature, light and contact stimulation on terpene emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compounds detected also were similar to those in the previous two studies, but the monoterpene proportions were similar only to those in Yani et al (1993). Yatagai et al (1995) reported that limonene was responsible for 83 % of the emission blend, however, limonene represented only ca. 4 % of the emissions in the control in this current study (Table 3, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The compounds detected also were similar to those in the previous two studies, but the monoterpene proportions were similar only to those in Yani et al (1993). Yatagai et al (1995) reported that limonene was responsible for 83 % of the emission blend, however, limonene represented only ca. 4 % of the emissions in the control in this current study (Table 3, Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Foliar Emission Rates Foliar terpene emission rates of the control ranged between 2 and 4 μg g −1 dw h −1 , similar to rates reported by Yatagai et al (1995) and Yani et al (1993) for the same species. The compounds detected also were similar to those in the previous two studies, but the monoterpene proportions were similar only to those in Yani et al (1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regional and global emission models for terpenoid compounds are typically based on this relationship and are parameterized with basal emission rates and temperature response factors obtained from field measurement campaigns in the respective ecosystems which rarely last more than a month. While other parameters like mechanical disturbance (Yatagai et al, 1995), humidity (Schade et al, 1999), and leaf expansion (Kuhn et al, 2004) are known to influence terpene emission it is not known what fraction of the total terpene emission can be attributed to additional parameters. In this paper we report above canopy measurements of monoterpene fluxes for a period of almost 11 months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates a turbulent atmosphere without the development of the nocturnal inversion, thus no decoupling between the boundary layer and the measurement point occurred and the station was still influenced by emissions at ground level or aged residual layer air through vertical and horizontal transport processes. Additionally, relative humidity and rainfall can exert positive influence on the emission of monoterpenes from pine trees (Schade et al, 1999), a further study proposed a connection between contact stimulation and stronger emission of terpenes in Japanese cypresses (Yatagai et al, 1995). Both hypotheses might also be relevant for nocturnal emissions originating from the mixed spruce forest around the Hohen- peissenberg, as the observed wind speed during these nights was mostly higher than 8 m s −1 , the humidity was very high and precipitation occurred frequently.…”
Section: Diel Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 95%