2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-020-04004-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second- and third-generation commercial Neisseria gonorrhoeae screening assays and the ongoing issues of false-positive results and confirmatory testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We demonstrate that the c6800 followed by the MP96-RP-GC testing is an improved supplemental testing method compared to c4800-RP-GC with a 100% confirmatory rate for urogenital samples and 93.6% for extragenital samples. As with our previous study and others ( 7 , 11 ), we conclude that supplemental testing is not required for c6800 for urogenital samples, but oropharyngeal samples should undergo secondary testing, in line with current Australian and UK guidelines ( 5 , 10 ). At the time of our previous study, the US version of the c6800 CTNG test did not have an oropharyngeal or anorectal claim, whereas the CE/IVD marked kits approved for use in Australia and the UK were approved for use for these sample types.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We demonstrate that the c6800 followed by the MP96-RP-GC testing is an improved supplemental testing method compared to c4800-RP-GC with a 100% confirmatory rate for urogenital samples and 93.6% for extragenital samples. As with our previous study and others ( 7 , 11 ), we conclude that supplemental testing is not required for c6800 for urogenital samples, but oropharyngeal samples should undergo secondary testing, in line with current Australian and UK guidelines ( 5 , 10 ). At the time of our previous study, the US version of the c6800 CTNG test did not have an oropharyngeal or anorectal claim, whereas the CE/IVD marked kits approved for use in Australia and the UK were approved for use for these sample types.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The problem has been most pronounced in testing oropharyngeal swabs, where commensal Neisseria species are ubiquitous ( 3 5 ). Earlier generation commercial assays lacked specific claims for testing oropharyngeal samples; however, third-generation commercial NG-NAATs have progressed to include performance claims for extragenital sites, such as oropharyngeal and anorectal swabs ( 2 , 6 , 7 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, if the reference assay presents a lack of specificity, there is a risk of underestimation of PPA. Whereas a lack of specificity was reported using cobas 4800 for N. gonorrhoae in oropharyngeal specimens [24], performance seemed better using cobas 6800 [13] but might remain insufficient. A third assay and/or Sanger DNA sequencing would have helped to resolve discordant samples but no original sample was left.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%