2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-degree burns with six etiologies treated with autologous noncultured cell-spray grafting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cells are isolated from a skin tissue (donor) and applied to the wound bed by spraying. This non‐invasive treatment strategy aims to facilitate the re‐epithelialization process, reducing the healing time in the hospital and minimizing complications . However, for the treatment of full‐thickness wounds a dermal element to achieve functional permanent skin is still required.…”
Section: Therapeutic Strategies For Skin Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells are isolated from a skin tissue (donor) and applied to the wound bed by spraying. This non‐invasive treatment strategy aims to facilitate the re‐epithelialization process, reducing the healing time in the hospital and minimizing complications . However, for the treatment of full‐thickness wounds a dermal element to achieve functional permanent skin is still required.…”
Section: Therapeutic Strategies For Skin Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photo also reveals areas in the neck that represented third-degree burns, which were treated with split skin grafting, but where the cell graft was additionally sprayed into the gaps between the mesh. Information on the cell isolation and the clinical procedure is given in [7,8,14,15]…”
Section: Clinical Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a previously clinically applied cell isolation method, we have demonstrated that autologous freshly isolated HEK containing skin cell suspensions can be used for immediate spray-grafting with clinically satisfying results [7,8,14,15]. This method differs from the process published by of Wood et al in performing an initial step of separation of the dermal and epidermal layer using the enzyme dispase followed by an extra cell washing step [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, technical problems exist for all of the previous spray devices, including facets of the spraying process and the effects of the spraying on the cells and their efficiency in wound repair (Veazey et al, 2005;Sosnowski et al, 2013). In addition, the previous spray devices were designed and manufactured in large sizes that minimize or obviate their portability and greatly limit application scenarios (Esteban-Vives et al, 2016a). Furthermore, the previous spray devices were found to generate problems caused by mechanical effets on the liquid that result in the formation of large droplets that limit the ability to generate a uniform cell delivery (Bahoric et al, 1997;Beneke et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%