1980
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1980.0011183x002000050002x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second Generation European Corn Borer Damage Relationships in Sweet Corn1

Abstract: European corn borer [Ostrinia nubilalis (Hubner)] is the most serious insect pest on sweet corn (Zea mays L.) grown for processing in the Midwest. This research was designed to evaluate diallel hybrid combinations of previously identified low‐ and high‐damage inbreds by second‐generation European corn borer following artificial infestation. During 3 years 10 low‐damage and 10 high‐damage inbreds were used in each of two separate diallels consisting of 45 F1 hybrids, without parents and reciprocal crosses. Whil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When both effects were signiÞcant for the same trait, dominance effects were double the additive effects. In contrast, Andrew and Mosley (1980) and Joyce and Davis (1995) suggested that genetic variation for ear damage by O. nubilalis was most likely attributed to additive effects. Grier and Davis (1980) and Lamb et al (1994) also concluded that additivity was more important than dominance for O. nubilalis damage, although they found signiÞcant nonadditive effects in the inheritance of ear resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…When both effects were signiÞcant for the same trait, dominance effects were double the additive effects. In contrast, Andrew and Mosley (1980) and Joyce and Davis (1995) suggested that genetic variation for ear damage by O. nubilalis was most likely attributed to additive effects. Grier and Davis (1980) and Lamb et al (1994) also concluded that additivity was more important than dominance for O. nubilalis damage, although they found signiÞcant nonadditive effects in the inheritance of ear resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ear resistance is a quantitative trait with inheritance largely additive (Andrew and Mosely 1980, Grier and Davis 1980, Joyce and Davis 1995. Andrew and Carlson (1976) concluded that damage caused by Þrst and second generations of European corn borer are not correlated because resistance for each generation is conferred by different mechanisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the latter traits, the GCAs were larger than the SCA effects; therefore, additive effects were the most important in the inheritance of ear damage by ECB. Andrew and Mosley (1980) found that additive effects were the most important in the inheritance of ear resistance to ECB in sweet corn, although they detected SCA and genotype × environment interactions in some crosses. Lamb et al (1994) found that only GCA was significant in the inheritance of field corn ear resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%