1996
DOI: 10.1137/s0895480192229236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-Order Rigidity and Prestress Stability for Tensegrity Frameworks

Abstract: Abstract. This paper defines two concepts of rigidity for tensegrity frameworks (frameworks with cables, bars, and struts): prestress stability and second-order rigidity. We demonstrate a hierarchy of rigidity--first-order rigidity implies prestress stability implies second-order rigidity implies rigiditymfor any framework. Examples show that none of these implications are reversible, even for bar frameworks. Other examples illustrate how these results can be used to create rigid tensegrity frameworks.This pap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
287
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(290 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
287
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. ., p T n ) ∈ R nd and is called a placement [83], embedding [14], realization [61] or configuration [19].…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…. ., p T n ) ∈ R nd and is called a placement [83], embedding [14], realization [61] or configuration [19].…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the rigidity matrix R(p) [19], compatibility matrix (B) [62] or geometrical matrix (Π) [83], which are equivalent concepts, can be defined. Such a matrix has a row for each edge and a column for each vertex and dimension, so it is an e by nd matrix.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations