2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.643481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second Order Stochastic Dominance, Reward-Risk Portfolio Selection and the CAPM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A portfolio selection model (without loss control) is therefore to solve the following optimization problem 4 Maximize V (X − B)…”
Section: Formulation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A portfolio selection model (without loss control) is therefore to solve the following optimization problem 4 Maximize V (X − B)…”
Section: Formulation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In it is assumed that B = 0 without loss of generality. 4 If X * is an optimal solution to the problem, then the optimal portfolio is the one that replicates X * , owing to the market completeness. An optimal terminal wealth profile is usually more revealing than the corresponding portfolio about the trading behaviors of the agent.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though quite different in approach, our analysis is similar in spirit to the analysis of Gourieroux and Monfort (2005), who analyze statistical properties of efficient portfolios in a constrained parametric expected utility optimization setup. De Giorgi and Post (2004) use a general equilibrium framework to develop a mean-CRR CAPM assuming that all agents have mean-CRR preferences, while we only assume this for the investor under consideration. Moreover, De Giorgi and Post (2004) consider atomic probability distributions of asset returns, while we focus on non-atomic return distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Giorgi and Post (2004) use a general equilibrium framework to develop a mean-CRR CAPM assuming that all agents have mean-CRR preferences, while we only assume this for the investor under consideration. Moreover, De Giorgi and Post (2004) consider atomic probability distributions of asset returns, while we focus on non-atomic return distributions. The remainder of this paper is structured as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%