2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4754(00)00284-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second order weak Runge–Kutta type methods for Itô equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to the nonlinear SDE [16,21] (7.1) dX(t) = 1 2 X(t) + X(t) 2 + 1 dt + X(t) 2 + 1 dW (t), X(0) = 0, on the time interval I = [0, 1] with the solution X(t) = sinh(t + W (t)).…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…to the nonlinear SDE [16,21] (7.1) dX(t) = 1 2 X(t) + X(t) 2 + 1 dt + X(t) 2 + 1 dW (t), X(0) = 0, on the time interval I = [0, 1] with the solution X(t) = sinh(t + W (t)).…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many stochastic schemes fall into the class of stochastic Runge-Kutta (SRK) methods. SRK methods have been studied both for strong approximation [1,10,11,16], where one is interested in obtaining good pathwise solutions, and for weak approximation [8,9,16,19,21,32], which focuses on the expectation of functionals of solutions. Order conditions for these methods are found by comparing series of the exact and the numerical solutions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the RHS of Equation (24) is O(h 4 ). Similarly, inequality (20) for p = 3 may also be proved. Inequality (21) for p = 1 is also readily proved, given that E(…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To prove inequality (20) for p = 2 (i.e. for the second moments of displacement increments), it is first noted (via Equation (19)) that:…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas strong approximation methods are designed to obtain good pathwise solutions [1], weak approximation focuses on the expectation of functionals of the solution. Second order stochastic Runge-Kutta (SRK) methods for the weak approximation of SDEs were proposed by Kloeden and Platen [4], Komori [5], Mackevicius and Navikas [6], Tocino and Vigo-Aguiar [13], and the authors [3,9]. However, these methods were not suitable for problems with high numbers m of Wiener processes, because for these methods the number of function evaluations per step increases quadratically in m. Recently, new classes of SRK methods were introduced by Rößler [10,?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%