2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second victim phenomenon: Is ‘just culture’ a reality? An integrative review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean scores of C-SVEST among nurses working at the regional and national level Chan et al, 2017) and culture-related factors (Quillivan et al, 2016;White & Delacroix, 2020). These connections may be helpful for managers in identifying high-risk groups for second victims in advance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean scores of C-SVEST among nurses working at the regional and national level Chan et al, 2017) and culture-related factors (Quillivan et al, 2016;White & Delacroix, 2020). These connections may be helpful for managers in identifying high-risk groups for second victims in advance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also observed that several factors can contribute to second victim syndrome, including age, marital status, nursing experience, having heard about the term ‘second victim’ and the time when PSIs happened ( P < 0.05); these are consistent with results for other specialties. Many studies demonstrate the connection between second victim syndrome and being female (Chan et al, 2017); inexperienced (Mok et al, 2019a); working department, mainly referring to paediatrics and obstetrics departments (Dukhanin et al, 2018; Nydoo et al, 2020); incident‐related factors (Huang et al, 2020; Vanhaecht et al, 2019); support‐related factors (Busch et al, 2021; Chan et al, 2017) and culture‐related factors (Quillivan et al, 2016; White & Delacroix, 2020). These connections may be helpful for managers in identifying high‐risk groups for second victims in advance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, considering the contemporaneous safety culture in hospitals, in which blame and shame still exists, they may experience a taboo on reaching out for support and share experiences about the involvement in a PSI. Organisations should shift from ‘blame culture’ to ‘just culture’, where health care organisation balances between punitive and non‐punitive approaches (White & Delacroix, 2020). During the COVID‐19 pandemic, 82% of the respondents talked with their partner and found that this was a positive experience, compared with 66.2% in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such discussion focused on the emic perception that punitive responses were seen to be more acceptable "within" the group or culture than the etic perspective, which has been attributed to the greater influence that other group members have on the safety of the group [56]. White and Delacroix [57] confirmed that punitive media communication is viewed from a less reliable blame culture rather than a reliable and just culture. As a result, a blame culture is likely to have a greater impact on vulnerable groups within the population and can be closely linked to those living within rural communities [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%